@thedozenunfiltered: “Can religious rules coexist with national law” #liamtuffs #truecrime #lslam #muhammadsaifullah #muslims

Omar Etheridge :

This brother is well-learned! Teach brother.

hunter :

name please sharia court in uk?i dont think any ?

BIG MAN :

true talk 🫡💯

jibrilAden :

Shariah Law councils :• No Legal Authority: They are not part of the British judicial system and have no statutory or legal power. • UK Law Takes Precedence: English civil and criminal law always supersedes Shariah rulings. • Civil Registration Required: A decision by a Shariah council cannot replace a legal civil marriage or a civil divorce processed through the UK family courts.

cxzodiac :

genius 💯💯💯💯

Amir Shavi🦞🦅 :

The Settlement Is All About Correct ✅ 💯

MISHA🌏 :

Many Black Muslims strongly support causes such as Palestine. But where is the same energy when Black Africans are suffering racism, exploitation, slavery, war or religious persecution? Why is it acceptable to tell Black people to stand with everyone else, but when Black people stand with their own communities, they are sometimes accused of putting race before religion? And why must the fixed words of salah be recited in Arabic if Allah understands every language in the world? Why have so many African Muslim communities adopted Arabic names, Arabic religious expressions and parts of Arab culture? Who were we before Islam and before Arabization? How much of our original African identity, language, traditions and culture have we lost along the way? I also keep hearing people say that Islam teaches complete equality between all races. If that is true, then Black Muslims should be able to question anti-Black racism openly without being attacked for it. They should be able to ask why some Black people still feel treated as inferior in certain Arab and Muslim societies. When I compare religions, I do not want to hear only: “Islam is perfect.” I want direct answers to difficult texts. If a religion is truly the truth, then it should be able to withstand questions and criticism. So answer Qur’an 4:24, 23:5–6 and 9:29. Answer Sahih al-Bukhari 6922. Answer Jamiʿ at-Tirmidhi 1663. Not with personal attacks. Not with “you do not understand Islam.” Not by changing the subject. Not by attacking the person asking the question. And not by ignoring the texts. Explain why these texts should still be considered morally acceptable for human beings in 2026

baba.ganoush18 :

Gold brank :

I think he talks about the goverment rules

𝔸𝔹𝔻𝕀ℝ𝕀ℤ𝔸𝕂 𝕄ℤ𝕌ℕ𝔾𝕌 :

scripted

Amir Shavi🦞🦅 :

asad :

you rent this gay he pay his religion so he is not muslim islam is the peacefully religion

bob22 :

keep Sharia law away from the west then 😐

James Mawson353 :

I like this geezer

Papi Chulo :

if u want sharia law… why dont u just go to a different country that has sharia law ? i dont get it

River Golightly :

Pure Evil!

UMAR :

if you ban Sharon law how we muzlamics marry by which law?

user28386759237806 :

after the interview

Ruqiya :

he's real somali

t.d :

🔥🔥🔥

cxzodiac :

💯💯💯

George Reynolds :

😳😳😳

, :

Islam is compatible with everyone, everywhere. The mistake is judging Islam through the lens and the behaviour of people who call themselves "Muslim", confusing human interpretation and practice with the religion itself. Islam is timeless; human interpretations of Islam are not. That is precisely where the confusion lies. And devil . And that is where the devil profits most: when human interpretation is mistaken for timeless truth, and confusion is mistaken for understanding. . If I wanted to understand the West Society, I wouldn’t pick one random white person and use his behaviour to define an entire civilisation. The same principle should apply to anything: never mistake one person’s interpretation or behaviour for the nature of the whole. . That is where the double standard and intellectual framing matter. The IRA committed serious violence and terrorism in the UK, yet its actions were understood as those of a particular organisation, not as proof that all white people, Irish people, or Christians were responsible. Yet when a Muslim commits violence, the frame can sometimes widen from the individual to Islam itself. Why shouldn’t the same distinction apply? . A carefully chosen word, question or narrative can become the bait that leads people toward a conclusion before they examine the evidence. Even calling alcohol and clubbing “Western values” is simplistic. The word alcohol comes through Arabic, not Islam; Arabic is a language and culture, not a synonym for Islam, and alcohol predates Islam. . Research it yourself. Go to the sources, examine the context, compare interpretations, and separate evidence from rhetoric. There shouldn’t have to be a middleman selling you his interpretation as the truth. Learn first, think for yourself, and then form a measured opinion.

Jon h :

This guy is a very dangerous unfortunately the white people they don’t understand Islam

Chelsea boy :

bru leave uk we as muslim dont need people like u islam is not that hard