@louisberries: all jokes ! #louis #lngshot #lngshot4sho #kpop #fyp

louis berries🍓

Open In TikTok:

Region: SA

Wednesday 07 October 2026 10:59:42 GMT

137064

54187

185

3832

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.58MB) Watermark .mp4 (0.96MB) Music .mp3

Comments

louisa :

french revolution

2026-10-07 12:36:05

4626

The Giants :

He is getting taller and but his patience is getting shorter

2026-10-07 14:37:08

989

사야나 𓃠 :

I’m scared

2026-10-07 11:24:27

2748

. :

Someone please make it like reality show😭

2026-10-07 13:04:14

169

Magui :

Louis and me

2026-10-07 12:58:30

806

★mahum★🫪★SAW CORTIS 8/6😝 :

Louis stay crashing out and throwing tantrums

2026-10-07 23:51:52

0

ryul kentut nuduh louis :

sumber stress nya Lui berasal dari abang nya itu bener ternyata 😭😭

2026-10-07 12:38:24

348

buji :

teenagers scared the living shit out of me

2026-10-08 00:16:43

0

ж :

aura lo merah

2026-10-07 14:13:45

408

ansafitaa :

gimana dia engga stress 🥰

2026-10-07 11:25:01

59

SasaJourdainLim :b :

Louis :

2026-10-07 12:15:28

164

-ทํานองเพลง🎵 :

Me when I get exposed

2026-10-07 22:48:28

1

斯托贝里 :

lui ini klo sama orang tuanya pasti anak penurut dan gk bandel, tp karena punya abangnya jail semua. siapa sih yg gk kesel🥰✌

2026-10-07 14:35:46

20

Gasu🖤 :

el se revelaba

2026-10-07 11:44:50

26

💓 :

ya se está revelando contra sus mayores jajaja

2026-10-07 13:15:22

23

𝓨𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓪𝟒𝐬𝐡𝐨 :

My 100% type btw

2026-10-07 23:09:39

0

diva ۶ৎ :

walaupun lui darah French tetep aja dia tinggalnya di korea ya, tpi kenapa gabisa make sumpit😭 lucu banget woik enak buat dijailin

2026-10-07 15:49:03

50

👾 :

That was the last straw 😭

2026-10-07 16:59:31

1

nino_ninot :

lui nggak lebay ya gesss, gua juga ngambek bgt kalo punya abang modelannya kek mereka bertiga usil bgt sumpah[Menangis]

2026-10-07 13:33:13

3120

𝓛𝓸𝓾𝓲𝓼’𝔀𝓲𝓯𝓮 :

Louis anda de rebelde

2026-10-07 16:25:44

69

Poyoiyoi🐢 :

😾

2026-10-07 13:23:35

7

☆thai☆ :

Louis tipo: me tienen todos harto, los voy a matar

2026-10-07 18:32:37

5

angie :

se nos revela el niño

2026-10-07 15:42:18

5

лина сяожууу | LOUDER⁹ 🇹🇭 :

literally louis-

2026-10-07 13:40:58

58

i'm ejeh :

emang abang durhaka, gua yakin si lui juga pengen mukulin abang abangnya jir (kalo berani)

2026-10-07 14:24:18

6

To see more videos from user @louisberries, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#روح_العميد🔥💛 #الاتحاد_قوة #👌👌👌👌

#روح_العميد🔥💛 #الاتحاد_قوة #👌👌👌👌

A live TV interview turns into a tense argument over pronouns, biological sex and whether a presenter should be required to use language she believes is factually incorrect. The guest asks to be addressed with specific pronouns, while the host pushes back and says that using those terms would conflict with how she understands the guest’s sex. What starts as a polite introduction quickly becomes the entire focus of the interview. The host argues that people are free to describe themselves however they choose, but says that freedom does not automatically create an obligation for everyone else to use the same words. She repeatedly separates personal identity from what she considers biological reality and says she should also be free to use language consistent with her own beliefs. The guest responds that using requested pronouns is a matter of basic respect and says the host is choosing language that feels dismissive. That disagreement captures a much larger cultural debate. Supporters of preferred-pronoun policies generally argue that using someone’s requested terms is a simple way to show respect and reduce unnecessary hostility. Critics argue that compelled language can cross into forced agreement, especially when a person believes the requested terminology conflicts with sex-based definitions. Those are different principles: one emphasizes social recognition, while the other emphasizes freedom of speech and factual language. What makes this exchange so striking is that neither side is really confused about the other’s position. They understand the disagreement and simply reject the rule the other person wants applied. The guest wants the host to use the requested pronouns; the host insists that she will not say something she considers untrue on her own show. That leaves the core question for viewers: when identity, courtesy and free expression collide, should respect require using another person’s preferred language, or should each person retain the right to choose the words they believe are accurate? #Pronouns #GenderDebate #FreeSpeech #LiveTV #PublicDebate

A live TV interview turns into a tense argument over pronouns, biological sex and whether a presenter should be required to use language she believes is factually incorrect. The guest asks to be addressed with specific pronouns, while the host pushes back and says that using those terms would conflict with how she understands the guest’s sex. What starts as a polite introduction quickly becomes the entire focus of the interview. The host argues that people are free to describe themselves however they choose, but says that freedom does not automatically create an obligation for everyone else to use the same words. She repeatedly separates personal identity from what she considers biological reality and says she should also be free to use language consistent with her own beliefs. The guest responds that using requested pronouns is a matter of basic respect and says the host is choosing language that feels dismissive. That disagreement captures a much larger cultural debate. Supporters of preferred-pronoun policies generally argue that using someone’s requested terms is a simple way to show respect and reduce unnecessary hostility. Critics argue that compelled language can cross into forced agreement, especially when a person believes the requested terminology conflicts with sex-based definitions. Those are different principles: one emphasizes social recognition, while the other emphasizes freedom of speech and factual language. What makes this exchange so striking is that neither side is really confused about the other’s position. They understand the disagreement and simply reject the rule the other person wants applied. The guest wants the host to use the requested pronouns; the host insists that she will not say something she considers untrue on her own show. That leaves the core question for viewers: when identity, courtesy and free expression collide, should respect require using another person’s preferred language, or should each person retain the right to choose the words they believe are accurate? #Pronouns #GenderDebate #FreeSpeech #LiveTV #PublicDebate

See if this policeman is suitable!!??#audit#fyp#foryou#usa#cops

See if this policeman is suitable!!??#audit#fyp#foryou#usa#cops

Cách couter Murad 😎#lienquanmobile #highlight #allain #murad #kirito

Cách couter Murad 😎#lienquanmobile #highlight #allain #murad #kirito

#italia

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy