@sonhamku: like bro I SEE HIM😭😭😭 #GenshinImpact #meme #lumine #paimon #snezhnaya

Holyzamasu
Holyzamasu
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Wednesday 07 October 2026 21:57:20 GMT
8410
622
12
19

Music

Download

Comments

larevacholerie
mollylolly :
genshin's obsession with forcing you to "look" at something every 5 seconds needs to be studied it's literally so obnoxious
2026-10-08 13:29:40
50
yuzuhalover1
YuzuhaLover :
alright now WHY does Lumine have a gun
2026-10-07 22:03:42
38
momoholicz
Momo :
I was so pissed off cus I thought it was a wifi and but it happened again in my alt so I knew hoyo made ts deliberately
2026-10-08 07:14:42
2
explosivequirk
explosivequirk :
Well he takes like 5 seconds to kill so…
2026-10-07 23:18:42
8
kal6812
KAL :
I absolutely despise the new traveller gun mechanic… I didn’t spend money and time on new characters just to play quest locked halfassed FPS shooter with glitchy mechanics and horrible gameplay 💀
2026-10-08 00:56:07
10
To see more videos from user @sonhamku, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

“Is it enough to say, ‘That wasn’t real Christianity’?” Madalyn Murray O’Hair, one of America’s most outspoken atheist activists, repeatedly challenged Christianity—not simply by questioning the existence of God, but by challenging the authority and influence of religion itself. Her criticism focused on a difficult historical question: If terrible things have been done in the name of a religion, how should those actions be understood in relation to the religion’s teachings? O’Hair pointed to religious persecution, warfare, dogmatism, inequality, and conflicts within Christian history as reasons to question whether the darker chapters could simply be separated from Christianity altogether. She also challenged the idea that Jesus should automatically be accepted as a moral authority. In public appearances, she made deliberately provocative arguments about Jesus, the Bible, morality, and the influence of Christianity. Her criticisms were often sweeping and confrontational, reflecting her broader opposition to organized religion. (PBS) But there is an important distinction. Christianity has encompassed vastly different traditions, interpretations, institutions, and movements across roughly two thousand years. Historians therefore debate how directly particular wars, persecutions, political actions, or social practices should be attributed to Christian doctrine itself. That makes O’Hair’s argument less about simply listing Christianity’s darkest moments—and more about asking how we judge a belief system. Should a religion be judged primarily by: 1️⃣ Its teachings? 2️⃣ What its followers have done in its name? 3️⃣ Or both? And if a believer says, “That wasn’t true Christianity,” what should determine whether that distinction is historically justified? O’Hair’s conclusions were fiercely controversial. But the question she raised remains worth examining: Do we judge ideas by their principles, their consequences, or the people who act in their name? What do you think? 👇🏾 #MadalynMurrayOHair #Christianity #Atheism #Religion #ReligiousHistory
“Is it enough to say, ‘That wasn’t real Christianity’?” Madalyn Murray O’Hair, one of America’s most outspoken atheist activists, repeatedly challenged Christianity—not simply by questioning the existence of God, but by challenging the authority and influence of religion itself. Her criticism focused on a difficult historical question: If terrible things have been done in the name of a religion, how should those actions be understood in relation to the religion’s teachings? O’Hair pointed to religious persecution, warfare, dogmatism, inequality, and conflicts within Christian history as reasons to question whether the darker chapters could simply be separated from Christianity altogether. She also challenged the idea that Jesus should automatically be accepted as a moral authority. In public appearances, she made deliberately provocative arguments about Jesus, the Bible, morality, and the influence of Christianity. Her criticisms were often sweeping and confrontational, reflecting her broader opposition to organized religion. (PBS) But there is an important distinction. Christianity has encompassed vastly different traditions, interpretations, institutions, and movements across roughly two thousand years. Historians therefore debate how directly particular wars, persecutions, political actions, or social practices should be attributed to Christian doctrine itself. That makes O’Hair’s argument less about simply listing Christianity’s darkest moments—and more about asking how we judge a belief system. Should a religion be judged primarily by: 1️⃣ Its teachings? 2️⃣ What its followers have done in its name? 3️⃣ Or both? And if a believer says, “That wasn’t true Christianity,” what should determine whether that distinction is historically justified? O’Hair’s conclusions were fiercely controversial. But the question she raised remains worth examining: Do we judge ideas by their principles, their consequences, or the people who act in their name? What do you think? 👇🏾 #MadalynMurrayOHair #Christianity #Atheism #Religion #ReligiousHistory

About