1. Home
  2. Detail

@juliettejules25: @Beauty Creations Cosmetics this collab was PERFECT @LAIKA Studios #coraline#coralinexbeautycreations#beautycreations

✨✨✨
✨✨✨
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Wednesday 07 October 2026 23:34:35 GMT
1183
71
0
5

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.86MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.39MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.74MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @juliettejules25, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

✨#dingyuxi #dinhvuhe #dingyuxi丁禹兮 #ryanding #丁禹兮
✨#dingyuxi #dinhvuhe #dingyuxi丁禹兮 #ryanding #丁禹兮






Wana earn as content creator join booking arc now. #EarnAsACreator #UGCNepal #NepalCreators #CreatorOpportunity #remotejobnepal
Wana earn as content creator join booking arc now. #EarnAsACreator #UGCNepal #NepalCreators #CreatorOpportunity #remotejobnepal
The commentator talks about discovering parts of American political history that he says were never taught to him in high school. He looks at the history of the Ku Klux Klan and the congressional votes surrounding the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, saying that what he found in the historical record challenged what he had previously been taught about the political parties. He then points to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and compares the support it received from Republicans and Democrats in Congress. He emphasizes that a higher percentage of Republican lawmakers supported the legislation than Democratic lawmakers, saying that this voting record forced him to question the way he had understood the political history of the civil rights era. The commentator then addresses the commonly discussed idea of a “party swap” during the 1960s. He argues that the claim that large numbers of Southern Democrats simply switched to the Republican Party does not match what he sees in the historical record. He points to figures such as George Wallace and Robert Byrd, who remained Democrats, as examples of politicians who did not make that switch. He argues that the political changes in the South were more complicated than a simple change of party labels. According to his explanation, Southern voters became increasingly separated from the national Democratic Party as its platform changed on issues including foreign policy, social issues, defense, and other national policies after the end of the Jim Crow era. The commentator ultimately argues that the Southern political realignment should be understood as a gradual political shift rather than a simple “party swap.” His point is that changing national platforms and political priorities played a major role in how Southern voters changed their political affiliations, and that looking at individual politicians and congressional voting records provides a different picture of how that realignment developed. #USHistory #CivilRights #PoliticalHistory #PartyRealignment
The commentator talks about discovering parts of American political history that he says were never taught to him in high school. He looks at the history of the Ku Klux Klan and the congressional votes surrounding the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, saying that what he found in the historical record challenged what he had previously been taught about the political parties. He then points to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and compares the support it received from Republicans and Democrats in Congress. He emphasizes that a higher percentage of Republican lawmakers supported the legislation than Democratic lawmakers, saying that this voting record forced him to question the way he had understood the political history of the civil rights era. The commentator then addresses the commonly discussed idea of a “party swap” during the 1960s. He argues that the claim that large numbers of Southern Democrats simply switched to the Republican Party does not match what he sees in the historical record. He points to figures such as George Wallace and Robert Byrd, who remained Democrats, as examples of politicians who did not make that switch. He argues that the political changes in the South were more complicated than a simple change of party labels. According to his explanation, Southern voters became increasingly separated from the national Democratic Party as its platform changed on issues including foreign policy, social issues, defense, and other national policies after the end of the Jim Crow era. The commentator ultimately argues that the Southern political realignment should be understood as a gradual political shift rather than a simple “party swap.” His point is that changing national platforms and political priorities played a major role in how Southern voters changed their political affiliations, and that looking at individual politicians and congressional voting records provides a different picture of how that realignment developed. #USHistory #CivilRights #PoliticalHistory #PartyRealignment

About

Legal