breakingrush789☀️ :
Both make good points, but both lose out on the reality that we have these things in our waterways, we have these things affecting our filtration, We have these things affecting our food supply. They’re arguing apples and oranges when the entire Orchard no matter which side you’re on that it’s growing apples and oranges is on fire. Making both arguments moot. Because the ultimate argument is that tariffs are making all sides of the argument worse. While they argue, apples, and oranges. we argue starvation, toxic chemicals poisoning us, not being able to afford anything (food, housing, medical care, childcare, mental health), and on top of it, we have a non-affordable sustainability in our workforces we don’t get paid enough to purchase bottled water all the time, we don’t get paid enough to eat the proper food that we should be eating, we don’t get paid enough to give our children what we wish they had, we don’t get paid enough to handle medical realities that are made worse by current crap policies and laws, we especially don’t get paid enough to handle the mental crisis that we go through when all of these things are collapsing around us, and we don’t even get paid enough to be able to have a financial standing that supports the need of all of these things while being slammed with every Possible bill, fee, point of debt that the majority of us are in. While they argue that the bush is burning, we ourselves are being lit on fire, and the fire is not going out it’s just being doused with gasoline both literally and figuratively.
2026-10-09 04:24:56