1. Home
  2. Detail

@m_808_880: #هاشتاق #تركي_الميزاني #اكسبلور #fyp #قصايد_شعر_خواطر

M
M
Open In TikTok:
Region: SA
Thursday 08 October 2026 23:07:33 GMT
5552
676
1
30

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.05MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.05MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

candy.977
L-1485 :
💗💗💗
2026-10-09 07:30:51
0
To see more videos from user @m_808_880, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

luvvclaree #fyp #viral #famous #xyzbca #makemefamous
luvvclaree #fyp #viral #famous #xyzbca #makemefamous
O secretário de Estado norte-americano Marco Rubio desvalorizou esta quinta-feira qualquer comparação entre as posições de Portugal e Espanha relativamente à operação militar contra o Irão, sublinhando que a visita a Lisboa tem como objetivo reforçar as relações bilaterais entre os dois países. #MarcoRubio #EUA #Portugal #Espanha #Irão
O secretário de Estado norte-americano Marco Rubio desvalorizou esta quinta-feira qualquer comparação entre as posições de Portugal e Espanha relativamente à operação militar contra o Irão, sublinhando que a visita a Lisboa tem como objetivo reforçar as relações bilaterais entre os dois países. #MarcoRubio #EUA #Portugal #Espanha #Irão
حكم الرامي الذي يسرق البفات #fyp #viral #شتبوست
حكم الرامي الذي يسرق البفات #fyp #viral #شتبوست
#nhahangcuongdeninhbinh #tràngan_ninhbình
#nhahangcuongdeninhbinh #tràngan_ninhbình
Justice Clarence Thomas made a striking argument in a June 25 Supreme Court opinion involving the Trump administration’s immigration policies. In a separate concurrence, Thomas argued that, even assuming the court had jurisdiction, the equal protection claim would fail because, in his view, “aliens have no equal protection rights against the Federal Government.” But there’s an important distinction: this was Thomas’s separate constitutional argument, not the Supreme Court’s majority holding. Thomas joined the Court’s opinion in full but wrote separately to argue additional grounds for rejecting the claim. 💬 What do you think about Thomas’s constitutional argument? Sources: U.S. Supreme Court #theblazwire #SupremeCourt #ClarenceThomas #Immigration
Justice Clarence Thomas made a striking argument in a June 25 Supreme Court opinion involving the Trump administration’s immigration policies. In a separate concurrence, Thomas argued that, even assuming the court had jurisdiction, the equal protection claim would fail because, in his view, “aliens have no equal protection rights against the Federal Government.” But there’s an important distinction: this was Thomas’s separate constitutional argument, not the Supreme Court’s majority holding. Thomas joined the Court’s opinion in full but wrote separately to argue additional grounds for rejecting the claim. 💬 What do you think about Thomas’s constitutional argument? Sources: U.S. Supreme Court #theblazwire #SupremeCourt #ClarenceThomas #Immigration
Cọp anh cọp em.✈️ #65jet7 #74jet10
Cọp anh cọp em.✈️ #65jet7 #74jet10

About

Legal