@lama.05l: لسوء حظي والدمع #جود_الشمري #explore #like #لسوء_حظي_والدمع #explore @67

لاما العنزي
لاما العنزي
Open In TikTok:
Region: SA
Friday 09 October 2026 09:41:27 GMT
22848
1051
90
201

Music

Download

Comments

j7e_iiw71
Jood🤍 :
طرف @Jetsar
2026-10-09 11:31:46
4
axrs702
اخو استاذ خزان :
محبين جود الشمري
2026-10-10 18:46:29
1
.g07259
.👑𓆩༺ ســكــتــون G ༻𓆪 :
ااابدداععع وربييييييي
2026-10-10 09:56:04
2
7._.rbi
S🇫🇷🇫🇷. :
مبدعههه+الجوده ماشاءالله
2026-10-10 01:43:52
2
.7160394
عقيد ربعه716 ✌️💤 :
مبددعههههه ياقلبيي🥰
2026-10-10 18:36:09
1
..7liua.2
“Lox” :
ابداع
2026-10-09 11:59:38
2
zik._n
كـــــلير||𝐤𝐥𝐢𝐫✨ :
من طرف @Jetsar
2026-10-09 09:59:19
3
yozx092
♕𝑨𝒆𝒔𝒂 عَيّسًـى :
ممكن حسابها
2026-10-09 23:12:36
1
n720128
نــيـُو الــعــتــيــبـي|🇸🇦 :
مممممبببببددددعهههه
2026-10-09 18:05:57
1
n726914
🥀!!𝑹𝑨𝑲𝑨𝑵✋🏻 :
ابداععع
2026-10-09 10:21:06
2
raed_565
R⁹¹² :
جود احبك مستحيل انساك
2026-10-10 11:17:57
0
jetstar388
jetstar :
ابدعتيييي
2026-10-09 09:44:34
2
1i_x712
ز :
لا بس عشان تشوفون التصويت
2026-10-10 16:52:26
0
j533833
aboHassan :
حلوه
2026-10-10 19:51:40
0
2ae350
عمران :
اویلیی یابا 😂😂
2026-10-10 18:40:49
0
..7liua.2
“Lox” :
Jetsarمن طرف
2026-10-09 11:59:35
2
n720128
نــيـُو الــعــتــيــبـي|🇸🇦 :
ففنن ما بعده فننن
2026-10-10 15:22:41
1
jetstar388
jetstar :
فنانهههه
2026-10-09 09:44:30
1
n720128
نــيـُو الــعــتــيــبـي|🇸🇦 :
وااووو
2026-10-10 15:22:46
1
n720128
نــيـُو الــعــتــيــبـي|🇸🇦 :
خياللل
2026-10-10 15:21:24
0
naw.716
يــارا👸🏻 :
مبدعهههه
2026-10-09 19:44:15
3
jetstar388
jetstar :
2026-10-09 09:44:26
2
a.m.g.309
𐙚 عـــ | البلوشي 𐙚 :
طرف Jetsar
2026-10-09 09:56:42
3
zx_g079
﮼سلطان ﮼الشمري :
2026-10-10 21:10:25
0
zik._n
كـــــلير||𝐤𝐥𝐢𝐫✨ :
اول
2026-10-09 09:51:20
1
To see more videos from user @lama.05l, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

“Is it enough to say, ‘That wasn’t real Christianity’?” Madalyn Murray O’Hair, one of America’s most outspoken atheist activists, repeatedly challenged Christianity—not simply by questioning the existence of God, but by challenging the authority and influence of religion itself. Her criticism focused on a difficult historical question: If terrible things have been done in the name of a religion, how should those actions be understood in relation to the religion’s teachings? O’Hair pointed to religious persecution, warfare, dogmatism, inequality, and conflicts within Christian history as reasons to question whether the darker chapters could simply be separated from Christianity altogether. She also challenged the idea that Jesus should automatically be accepted as a moral authority. In public appearances, she made deliberately provocative arguments about Jesus, the Bible, morality, and the influence of Christianity. Her criticisms were often sweeping and confrontational, reflecting her broader opposition to organized religion. (PBS) But there is an important distinction. Christianity has encompassed vastly different traditions, interpretations, institutions, and movements across roughly two thousand years. Historians therefore debate how directly particular wars, persecutions, political actions, or social practices should be attributed to Christian doctrine itself. That makes O’Hair’s argument less about simply listing Christianity’s darkest moments—and more about asking how we judge a belief system. Should a religion be judged primarily by: 1️⃣ Its teachings? 2️⃣ What its followers have done in its name? 3️⃣ Or both? And if a believer says, “That wasn’t true Christianity,” what should determine whether that distinction is historically justified? O’Hair’s conclusions were fiercely controversial. But the question she raised remains worth examining: Do we judge ideas by their principles, their consequences, or the people who act in their name? What do you think? 👇🏾 #MadalynMurrayOHair #Christianity #Atheism #Religion #ReligiousHistory
“Is it enough to say, ‘That wasn’t real Christianity’?” Madalyn Murray O’Hair, one of America’s most outspoken atheist activists, repeatedly challenged Christianity—not simply by questioning the existence of God, but by challenging the authority and influence of religion itself. Her criticism focused on a difficult historical question: If terrible things have been done in the name of a religion, how should those actions be understood in relation to the religion’s teachings? O’Hair pointed to religious persecution, warfare, dogmatism, inequality, and conflicts within Christian history as reasons to question whether the darker chapters could simply be separated from Christianity altogether. She also challenged the idea that Jesus should automatically be accepted as a moral authority. In public appearances, she made deliberately provocative arguments about Jesus, the Bible, morality, and the influence of Christianity. Her criticisms were often sweeping and confrontational, reflecting her broader opposition to organized religion. (PBS) But there is an important distinction. Christianity has encompassed vastly different traditions, interpretations, institutions, and movements across roughly two thousand years. Historians therefore debate how directly particular wars, persecutions, political actions, or social practices should be attributed to Christian doctrine itself. That makes O’Hair’s argument less about simply listing Christianity’s darkest moments—and more about asking how we judge a belief system. Should a religion be judged primarily by: 1️⃣ Its teachings? 2️⃣ What its followers have done in its name? 3️⃣ Or both? And if a believer says, “That wasn’t true Christianity,” what should determine whether that distinction is historically justified? O’Hair’s conclusions were fiercely controversial. But the question she raised remains worth examining: Do we judge ideas by their principles, their consequences, or the people who act in their name? What do you think? 👇🏾 #MadalynMurrayOHair #Christianity #Atheism #Religion #ReligiousHistory

About