@sebawanghq: #tiktoklive #livehighlights

TUDUNG SARUNG SEBAWANGHQ
TUDUNG SARUNG SEBAWANGHQ
Open In TikTok:
Region: MY
Saturday 10 October 2026 02:15:00 GMT
97
0
0
0

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @sebawanghq, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

🔵 Why Has Circular Running Become a Necessity in Modern Physical Conditioning? During a football match, 👉 Over 80% of running is not done in a straight line. The player presses, closes down angles, maneuvers, moves off the ball… and all of this happens in curved and circular paths. ❌ Yet, many programs still rely solely on straight-line running. ⚠️ A clear methodological error. 📊 What do the numbers say? (Not opinions) 🔬 Biomechanical studies and GPS data have proven that running in a circular path leads to: 🔹 +20% to +35% increase in load on the inner leg. 🔹 +15% to +25% increase in gluteus medius activity (Pelvic stability). 🔹 +18% increase in adductor muscle workload. 🔹 –20% reduction in joint pressure compared to violent stops and accelerations. 📌 Conclusion: ➡️ Better control ➡️ Higher stability ➡️ Fewer injuries ⚡ Speed: A Truth Some Might Not Like 📈 Field data from elite players shows: 🟢 Maximum speed in a straight line: 9.0 – 9.6 m/s 🔵 Maximum speed in a circular path (15–20 m radius): 7.2 – 8.0 m/s ➡️ A deficit of 15% to 22% 🎯 The Goal of Modern Training: Reducing this gap to less than 10%. 📌 A fast player in a straight line ≠ A fast and effective player in a match. ❤️ Cardiovascular and Energetic Benefits At the same intensity: Straight-line running: ≈ 85% of FC_{max} (Max Heart Rate) Circular running: ≈ 82–83% of FC_{max} ➡️ Smoother effort ➡️ Less stress on the nervous system ➡️ Ideal for football-specific aerobic work 🩹 Injury Prevention (Club Statistics) Clubs that integrated circular running into their programming recorded: ❌ –25% to –35% in adductor injuries. ❌ –20% in hamstring injury reoccurrences. ❌ –18% in anterior knee joint pain. 📌 The Reason: The body gradually adapts to the actual constraints of the match.
🔵 Why Has Circular Running Become a Necessity in Modern Physical Conditioning? During a football match, 👉 Over 80% of running is not done in a straight line. The player presses, closes down angles, maneuvers, moves off the ball… and all of this happens in curved and circular paths. ❌ Yet, many programs still rely solely on straight-line running. ⚠️ A clear methodological error. 📊 What do the numbers say? (Not opinions) 🔬 Biomechanical studies and GPS data have proven that running in a circular path leads to: 🔹 +20% to +35% increase in load on the inner leg. 🔹 +15% to +25% increase in gluteus medius activity (Pelvic stability). 🔹 +18% increase in adductor muscle workload. 🔹 –20% reduction in joint pressure compared to violent stops and accelerations. 📌 Conclusion: ➡️ Better control ➡️ Higher stability ➡️ Fewer injuries ⚡ Speed: A Truth Some Might Not Like 📈 Field data from elite players shows: 🟢 Maximum speed in a straight line: 9.0 – 9.6 m/s 🔵 Maximum speed in a circular path (15–20 m radius): 7.2 – 8.0 m/s ➡️ A deficit of 15% to 22% 🎯 The Goal of Modern Training: Reducing this gap to less than 10%. 📌 A fast player in a straight line ≠ A fast and effective player in a match. ❤️ Cardiovascular and Energetic Benefits At the same intensity: Straight-line running: ≈ 85% of FC_{max} (Max Heart Rate) Circular running: ≈ 82–83% of FC_{max} ➡️ Smoother effort ➡️ Less stress on the nervous system ➡️ Ideal for football-specific aerobic work 🩹 Injury Prevention (Club Statistics) Clubs that integrated circular running into their programming recorded: ❌ –25% to –35% in adductor injuries. ❌ –20% in hamstring injury reoccurrences. ❌ –18% in anterior knee joint pain. 📌 The Reason: The body gradually adapts to the actual constraints of the match.

About