@lafamosacj: #☺️☺️ #🫶🥰

LA FAMOSA MIA 💓
LA FAMOSA MIA 💓
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Sunday 11 October 2026 15:46:58 GMT
358
29
0
0

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @lafamosacj, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

It's been reported that Gen Z are drinking less than previous generations, and for some, this is a good thing. It's a sign of maturity, of virtue, and of being able to find happiness without getting drunk. But in this week's Mini Philosophy interview, the philosopher Edward Slingerland argues that getting drunk is important to any large-scale society.  Slingerland argues that drinking and getting drunk with friends is a kind of chemical handshake. The problem in any large-scale society is how we can come to trust other people, because we are all looking out for ourselves. And yet, we recognise that we have to cooperate if we are to get certain things. And so, Slingerland argues, we've developed certain social technologies to break down suspicion and to build trust. For example, religion is one social technology, but just as early, and just as widespread, is alcohol. This is how we put it. 'And so my argument is alcohol's been a crucial tool in helping us to get that, that trust. There are other tools. Religion is one of them as well. And they often are used in conjunction. So you and I are, we have to negotiate a treaty. We're potentially hostile. We have different interests. We sit down and we start drinking. It's, it's the mental equivalent of shaking hands to show that you're not carrying a weapon. When you sit down and start drinking with me, you're chemically disarming your brain.'  Drinking and getting drunk with others is what makes us vulnerable, it brings us together, and it fosters trust. If Slingerland is right, and we stop drinking and we stop using these social technologies, then how can we learn to cooperate? How can we learn to trust each other?
It's been reported that Gen Z are drinking less than previous generations, and for some, this is a good thing. It's a sign of maturity, of virtue, and of being able to find happiness without getting drunk. But in this week's Mini Philosophy interview, the philosopher Edward Slingerland argues that getting drunk is important to any large-scale society. Slingerland argues that drinking and getting drunk with friends is a kind of chemical handshake. The problem in any large-scale society is how we can come to trust other people, because we are all looking out for ourselves. And yet, we recognise that we have to cooperate if we are to get certain things. And so, Slingerland argues, we've developed certain social technologies to break down suspicion and to build trust. For example, religion is one social technology, but just as early, and just as widespread, is alcohol. This is how we put it. 'And so my argument is alcohol's been a crucial tool in helping us to get that, that trust. There are other tools. Religion is one of them as well. And they often are used in conjunction. So you and I are, we have to negotiate a treaty. We're potentially hostile. We have different interests. We sit down and we start drinking. It's, it's the mental equivalent of shaking hands to show that you're not carrying a weapon. When you sit down and start drinking with me, you're chemically disarming your brain.' Drinking and getting drunk with others is what makes us vulnerable, it brings us together, and it fosters trust. If Slingerland is right, and we stop drinking and we stop using these social technologies, then how can we learn to cooperate? How can we learn to trust each other?

About