@zarafshansaduzai: با معذرت دوستان یک فکاهی است کمی بخندیم..

Zarafshan Saduzai
Zarafshan Saduzai
Open In TikTok:
Region: GB
Monday 12 October 2026 01:31:13 GMT
40585
507
37
1117

Music

Download

Comments

ilovenature3953
ilovenature :
good one
2026-10-12 20:29:03
1
suhail.sultani8
Suhail :
برعکس گفتی 😂😁
2026-10-12 18:12:50
0
zeeeeeeeee60
Aqsa :
ده قاری خدا شون موردهم از خنده
2026-10-12 14:01:27
5
1tx.tjk
TᗩᒍIK👑 :
2026-10-12 18:03:37
2
kh.qay
Kh Qay :
2026-10-12 13:42:58
1
bondjamesbond007one
Oak :
بسیار بد است
2026-10-12 09:23:04
0
samurei_007
samurei_007 :
🤪
2026-10-12 11:32:40
1
user3615035971659
Джавид Насери :
2026-10-12 08:24:38
1
mustafa_42053
Mustafa_420 :
2026-10-12 13:09:24
1
heidari874
Heidari :
شخصیت افغان را ثابت میکنید در جهان فارسی زبان ها
2026-10-12 12:02:22
1
hussaini4298
C4 zpro :
😂😂😂😂😂😂 خداوند اصلاح تان کند ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🥰🥰 یکی گفتی پخته گفتی بخدا مره در گپ های حق و ناحق خنده نمی گیرد مگر به رقم فکاهی کدام خر ره اگه خنده نگیرد ههههههه کشتینما.
2026-10-12 12:20:03
3
tawhed.farooqi
.king of room :
عطمی پنجشیری بوده
2026-10-12 10:04:51
3
babifdgg
Ba bi :
جایکه بگا زیاده حتما بده هم زیاده
2026-10-12 09:15:19
0
sameahamraz
احمدی :
😂😂😂
2026-10-12 19:58:10
1
mab99992
MAB :
😂😂😂
2026-10-12 20:30:59
1
user2295581677375
عبدالصبور صبوری :
😂😂😂😂😂
2026-10-12 20:06:07
1
niikaan
NIKAN :
😂😂😂
2026-10-12 19:06:24
1
nsediqi29
Momand watandost 🕊️ :
🥰😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😂
2026-10-12 18:04:17
1
niikaan
NIKAN :
😂😂😂
2026-10-12 19:06:17
1
niikaan
NIKAN :
😁😁😁
2026-10-12 19:06:21
1
parwezko
Parwiz :
😂😂😂😂
2026-10-12 14:45:17
2
mulana1114
📿 پیر صاحب✍ :
[اشک شوق][اشک شوق][اشک شوق]
2026-10-12 14:16:25
1
glauben52
Hab :
😂😂😂😂😂😂
2026-10-12 15:22:03
1
abbas.rezaee13842026
(。♥️❅✵ 𝒜бб‿𝟺$ ✵❅♥️。) :
😂😂😂
2026-10-12 17:26:25
1
sarbaz9623
سربازان گمنام :
🥳😜🤣
2026-10-12 08:12:07
1
To see more videos from user @zarafshansaduzai, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

🚨 KELLY CLARKSON'S $15,000 BIRD CONTROVERSY REACHES THE VIEW AS VIRAL FEUD CONTINUES October 12, 2026 | REAL TALK MEDIA What started as a shopping trip has turned into a major celebrity controversy involving Kelly Clarkson, a Brooklyn specialty store, and a mechanical singing bird reportedly valued at $15,000. Now the disagreement has reached national television. During Monday's episode of The View, the hosts debated whether Clarkson should have publicly criticized the business after claiming she received disrespectful customer service. The controversy began Saturday, October 10, when Clarkson visited Art of Play, a Brooklyn shop specializing in unusual gifts, games, and collectibles. Clarkson later posted about the experience on social media. According to the singer, she expressed interest in purchasing an expensive mechanical bird but felt that an employee assumed she couldn't afford it. She compared the encounter to the famous shopping scene in the movie Pretty Woman, in which a character is treated dismissively by sales associates. However, Art of Play disputes Clarkson's account. The business says the mechanical bird, named Molly, is permanently attached to the store's wall and serves as a decorative centerpiece. According to the shop, that particular bird was not available for purchase. The store says employees instead explained that the artist who created Molly had a nearly identical piece available for $15,000. They also reportedly offered to show Clarkson another mechanical bird priced at approximately $2,000. The business claims Clarkson spent around five minutes inside the store before leaving. Clarkson challenged that explanation. She maintained that the item had a visible price tag and that the employee's tone suggested she could not afford it. The singer accused the business of misrepresenting their interaction and defended her decision to speak publicly about what she considered disrespectful treatment. The disagreement quickly spread across social media, generating millions of views and renewed debate about celebrity influence. On October 12, the controversy became a discussion topic on The View. Sunny Hostin questioned whether a dispute involving an expensive collectible should have been handled privately rather than becoming a public confrontation. Ana Navarro also raised concerns about the influence celebrities can have when criticizing businesses in front of millions of followers. Sara Haines acknowledged that Clarkson's account could be genuine but questioned whether escalating the disagreement online would help either side resolve it. The discussion highlighted a larger issue: the balance between a customer's right to criticize poor service and the responsibility that comes with having a massive public platform. Meanwhile, Art of Play says it has contacted Clarkson directly in hopes of resolving the misunderstanding. The business maintains that it welcomes customers regardless of their purchasing intentions. Clarkson continues to dispute the store's description of the encounter. At this stage, neither side's interpretation of the employee's behavior has been independently established. What is confirmed is that the disagreement occurred over the weekend, both parties publicly responded, and The View discussed the controversy on October 12. The bigger question is whether public criticism is appropriate when a customer feels disrespected, especially when that customer has millions of followers. REAL TALK MEDIA wants to know: Was Kelly Clarkson justified in speaking publicly about her experience? Or should she have contacted the business privately before criticizing it online? And should celebrities be held to a different standard when using their platforms to criticize small businesses? NEWS | CULTURE | REAL CONVERSATIONS #KellyClarkson #CelebrityNews #ViralNews #EntertainmentNews #RealTalkMedia
🚨 KELLY CLARKSON'S $15,000 BIRD CONTROVERSY REACHES THE VIEW AS VIRAL FEUD CONTINUES October 12, 2026 | REAL TALK MEDIA What started as a shopping trip has turned into a major celebrity controversy involving Kelly Clarkson, a Brooklyn specialty store, and a mechanical singing bird reportedly valued at $15,000. Now the disagreement has reached national television. During Monday's episode of The View, the hosts debated whether Clarkson should have publicly criticized the business after claiming she received disrespectful customer service. The controversy began Saturday, October 10, when Clarkson visited Art of Play, a Brooklyn shop specializing in unusual gifts, games, and collectibles. Clarkson later posted about the experience on social media. According to the singer, she expressed interest in purchasing an expensive mechanical bird but felt that an employee assumed she couldn't afford it. She compared the encounter to the famous shopping scene in the movie Pretty Woman, in which a character is treated dismissively by sales associates. However, Art of Play disputes Clarkson's account. The business says the mechanical bird, named Molly, is permanently attached to the store's wall and serves as a decorative centerpiece. According to the shop, that particular bird was not available for purchase. The store says employees instead explained that the artist who created Molly had a nearly identical piece available for $15,000. They also reportedly offered to show Clarkson another mechanical bird priced at approximately $2,000. The business claims Clarkson spent around five minutes inside the store before leaving. Clarkson challenged that explanation. She maintained that the item had a visible price tag and that the employee's tone suggested she could not afford it. The singer accused the business of misrepresenting their interaction and defended her decision to speak publicly about what she considered disrespectful treatment. The disagreement quickly spread across social media, generating millions of views and renewed debate about celebrity influence. On October 12, the controversy became a discussion topic on The View. Sunny Hostin questioned whether a dispute involving an expensive collectible should have been handled privately rather than becoming a public confrontation. Ana Navarro also raised concerns about the influence celebrities can have when criticizing businesses in front of millions of followers. Sara Haines acknowledged that Clarkson's account could be genuine but questioned whether escalating the disagreement online would help either side resolve it. The discussion highlighted a larger issue: the balance between a customer's right to criticize poor service and the responsibility that comes with having a massive public platform. Meanwhile, Art of Play says it has contacted Clarkson directly in hopes of resolving the misunderstanding. The business maintains that it welcomes customers regardless of their purchasing intentions. Clarkson continues to dispute the store's description of the encounter. At this stage, neither side's interpretation of the employee's behavior has been independently established. What is confirmed is that the disagreement occurred over the weekend, both parties publicly responded, and The View discussed the controversy on October 12. The bigger question is whether public criticism is appropriate when a customer feels disrespected, especially when that customer has millions of followers. REAL TALK MEDIA wants to know: Was Kelly Clarkson justified in speaking publicly about her experience? Or should she have contacted the business privately before criticizing it online? And should celebrities be held to a different standard when using their platforms to criticize small businesses? NEWS | CULTURE | REAL CONVERSATIONS #KellyClarkson #CelebrityNews #ViralNews #EntertainmentNews #RealTalkMedia

About