@mostafa_nab: تمرين الشتاء من البيت ❄️ للتدريب الشخصي من البيت أرسل تدريب #الخليج #السعودية #الكويت #رياضة

مصطفى
مصطفى
Open In TikTok:
Region: PS
Monday 12 October 2026 16:40:33 GMT
24438
730
14
91

Music

Download

Comments

abo.ilo
باتمان لابس فستان :
تدريب
2026-10-16 09:59:58
0
ip_ali2
✦✧؏ـليہ // 𝓐𝓵𝓲 ✧✦ :
نورمال احس في غلط
2026-10-13 16:54:30
1
dfu_12
محارب النسويات🤟🇸🇦🇸🇦 :
تكفون استمرو
2026-10-16 09:37:18
0
minatuominatuo176
كوزمتك حمودي ميدو :
شسمه
2026-10-16 12:42:12
0
user6241079137504
أبو حسن :
اول
2026-10-13 01:24:01
0
mostafa_nab
مصطفى :
للتدريب الشخصي من البيت ارسل (تدريب) على الرسائل 🫡
2026-10-13 08:31:16
0
ahmed.1431h
الفقير إلى الله :
2026-10-14 18:08:31
0
w.fhk4
S :
عمري 14 يمديني أصير زي جسمك تكفى رد
2026-10-13 20:14:34
0
alrbash7766
الرباش :
تدريب
2026-10-14 17:44:25
0
mgo_299
عود ليش :
تدريب
2026-10-15 08:52:35
0
faid1409a
faid1409a :
تدريب
2026-10-14 14:22:26
0
cr7mvs
mhmd :
تدريب
2026-10-14 13:17:52
0
oussama.ninja0
oussama ziada :
الوحش😁
2026-10-13 23:27:38
0
rkk_an
🇸🇦ولد عسيرر707 :
مافيه اي شي غلط في الجسم الا ماشاء الله تبارك الرحمن لاكن الله ليجعلني كذا ياااارب ولا تبلاني
2026-10-16 18:55:13
0
To see more videos from user @mostafa_nab, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Addressing Parliament on October 15, 2026, Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar held the PTI government responsible for facilitating the return of TTP militants to Pakistan and releasing more than 100 detainees. His remarks, however, invite scrutiny of the PDM government’s own handling of the TTP question, particularly its negotiations and proposed resettlement arrangements in 2022. In June 2022, then interior minister Rana Sanaullah publicly defended negotiations with the banned outfit, maintaining that the process would remain within the constitutional and legal framework and proceed under parliamentary oversight. On July 5, 2022, the Parliamentary Committee on National Security endorsed the continuation of dialogue. Contemporary reporting also outlined a proposed framework envisaging the return of thousands of TTP militants and their family members, with amnesty and reintegration among the issues under consideration. The record, therefore, does not support a simple distinction between a PTI government that pursued negotiations and a PDM government that rejected them. Both governments engaged in dialogue with the TTP, while the terms, scope and implementation of their respective approaches require separate scrutiny. Dar’s criticism consequently raises a pertinent question: if negotiations, the possible return of militants and their reintegration were also under consideration during the PDM government, what substantive differences distinguished that policy from the one he now condemns? A comprehensive assessment requires clarity on the decisions taken, concessions contemplated, authorities responsible for approving them, and the extent to which the proposed arrangements were implemented.
Addressing Parliament on October 15, 2026, Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar held the PTI government responsible for facilitating the return of TTP militants to Pakistan and releasing more than 100 detainees. His remarks, however, invite scrutiny of the PDM government’s own handling of the TTP question, particularly its negotiations and proposed resettlement arrangements in 2022. In June 2022, then interior minister Rana Sanaullah publicly defended negotiations with the banned outfit, maintaining that the process would remain within the constitutional and legal framework and proceed under parliamentary oversight. On July 5, 2022, the Parliamentary Committee on National Security endorsed the continuation of dialogue. Contemporary reporting also outlined a proposed framework envisaging the return of thousands of TTP militants and their family members, with amnesty and reintegration among the issues under consideration. The record, therefore, does not support a simple distinction between a PTI government that pursued negotiations and a PDM government that rejected them. Both governments engaged in dialogue with the TTP, while the terms, scope and implementation of their respective approaches require separate scrutiny. Dar’s criticism consequently raises a pertinent question: if negotiations, the possible return of militants and their reintegration were also under consideration during the PDM government, what substantive differences distinguished that policy from the one he now condemns? A comprehensive assessment requires clarity on the decisions taken, concessions contemplated, authorities responsible for approving them, and the extent to which the proposed arrangements were implemented.

About