@eira4919: O freestyle do Bulin 47 em Madrid está em todo o lado 😂🔥 Agora estão a fazer versões com personagens diferentes na mesma cena. 👽😂 Só precisas de uma foto para fazer a tua própria versão. bulin 47 freestyle bulin47 freestyle bulin 47 rap bulin 47 rap freestyle bulin 47 freestyle original bulin 47 rap original bulin 47 improvisado bulin 47 improvisado kevin way kevin way bulin 47 kevin wai bulin 47 kevin cito e bulin 47 freestyle bulin 47 meme bulin 47 freestyle meme bulin 47 IA bulin 47 freestyle IA vídeo de bulin 47 vídeo de bulin 47 freestyle como fazer o vídeo de bulin 47 como fazer bulin 47 freestyle como fazer o freestyle de bulin 47 filtro bulin 47 efeito bulin 47 #bulin47 #bulin47freestyle #bulin47desafio #capcut #capcutpioneer

Eira
Eira
Open In TikTok:
Region: BR
Tuesday 13 October 2026 12:08:11 GMT
365
2
0
0

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @eira4919, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Thirteen House of Representatives members opposed the proposed ₱7.2-trillion national budget for 2027 on Monday, Oct. 12, citing concerns about government spending priorities, transparency and the distribution of public funds. The House passed House Bill No. 10858 on third and final reading, with 281 lawmakers voting in favor, 13 against and one abstaining. Those who voted against the measure were Navotas Rep. Toby Tiangco, Caloocan 2nd District Rep. Edgar Erice, Cebu City 1st District Rep. Rachel del Mar, Kamanggagawa Rep. Eli San Fernando, Dinagat Islands Rep. Kaka Bag-ao, Akbayan Reps. Perci Cendaña, Chel Diokno and Dadah Kiram Ismula, Kabataan Rep. Renee Co, Mamamayang Liberal Rep. Leila de Lima, Gabriela Rep. Sarah Elago, Albay 1st District Rep. Krisel Lagman, and ACT Teachers Rep. Antonio Tinio. Tiangco questioned the House's transparency in scrutinizing its own spending, particularly a ₱5-billion increase approved by the Budget Amendments and Review Subcommittee (BARSc), which raised the chamber's proposed budget to ₱28.37 billion. He argued that Congress should uphold the same transparency standards it expects government agencies to follow. Del Mar opposed the budget after the proposed infrastructure funding for her district was reduced by more than half, from ₱1.3 billion in 2026 to ₱492 million in 2027. She also questioned the reported non-release of ₱280 million allocated in 2025 and another ₱643 million for 2026. San Fernando said the budget failed to address people's needs and lacked transparency. He also described the House's BARSc hearing as
Thirteen House of Representatives members opposed the proposed ₱7.2-trillion national budget for 2027 on Monday, Oct. 12, citing concerns about government spending priorities, transparency and the distribution of public funds. The House passed House Bill No. 10858 on third and final reading, with 281 lawmakers voting in favor, 13 against and one abstaining. Those who voted against the measure were Navotas Rep. Toby Tiangco, Caloocan 2nd District Rep. Edgar Erice, Cebu City 1st District Rep. Rachel del Mar, Kamanggagawa Rep. Eli San Fernando, Dinagat Islands Rep. Kaka Bag-ao, Akbayan Reps. Perci Cendaña, Chel Diokno and Dadah Kiram Ismula, Kabataan Rep. Renee Co, Mamamayang Liberal Rep. Leila de Lima, Gabriela Rep. Sarah Elago, Albay 1st District Rep. Krisel Lagman, and ACT Teachers Rep. Antonio Tinio. Tiangco questioned the House's transparency in scrutinizing its own spending, particularly a ₱5-billion increase approved by the Budget Amendments and Review Subcommittee (BARSc), which raised the chamber's proposed budget to ₱28.37 billion. He argued that Congress should uphold the same transparency standards it expects government agencies to follow. Del Mar opposed the budget after the proposed infrastructure funding for her district was reduced by more than half, from ₱1.3 billion in 2026 to ₱492 million in 2027. She also questioned the reported non-release of ₱280 million allocated in 2025 and another ₱643 million for 2026. San Fernando said the budget failed to address people's needs and lacked transparency. He also described the House's BARSc hearing as "scripted." De Lima criticized the budget's focus on financial assistance programs, while Diokno questioned allocations for education and other essential services. Cendaña raised concerns about funding for health care and public transportation, while Ismula criticized what she considered insufficient health care funding. Tinio alleged that ₱100.44 billion of the ₱116.32 billion in amendments approved by BARSc on Oct. 1 and 2 involved pork barrel-type allocations, including infrastructure projects, financial assistance programs and other discretionary funds.

About