@gabriela_flax: Let's proceed with Option 1: the remaining 14-conversation evaluation, with a checkpoint after the first five. I don't want to keep retesting Marisol in isolation. We've established that Discover can produce the three moments, and its efficiency and privacy improvements are substantial. The priority now is understanding whether contextual grounding problems persist across different personas. For the first batch, select five distinct scenarios covering: - Restraint, including Tobias. - Hidden capabilities. - Unexpected buyers. - Rejected interpretations or boundaries. - Alternative portfolio-career configurations. Evaluate contextual grounding separately from the three moments and overall coaching quality. In particular, check that: - Quotes are attributed to the correct experience. - A statement about one situation isn't generalised to someone's entire career or personality. - Rejections and preferences aren't broadened beyond what the person said. - Buyer hypotheses remain hypotheses. - Discover doesn't save interpretations that weren't presented to the person. Stop after the first five and report the results before proceeding. If any critical grounding failures appear, show me the exact quote, what Discover inferred, why the inference was unsupported, and whether the problem is isolated or recurring. Don't automatically keep patching instructions and rerunning the same scenario. If the first batch is clean on critical requirements, ask for my approval to run the remaining nine conversations. Keep tracking tokens, tool calls, runtime, permission prompts and temporary files. The goal is not just to produce surprising insights. It's to produce surprising insights that the person recognises as true. Don't start D3 or mark D2 complete. The comprehensive evaluation and my blind review remain outstanding.

337

2026-10-14 15:53:29

To see more videos from user @gabriela_flax, please go to the Tikwm homepage.