@izzane.animation: Real Madrid impressed FC Barcelona with their REMONTADA—and next up, it’s Barça’s turn #lamineyamal

izzane animation
izzane animation
Open In TikTok:
Region: CM
Thursday 15 October 2026 18:10:05 GMT
75865
10571
474
322

Music

Download

Comments

mam945806
ᡕᠵ᠊ᡃ່࡚ࠢ࠘ ⸝່ࠡࠣ᠊߯᠆ࠣ࠘ᡁࠣ࠘᠊᠊ࠢ࠘𐡏* * :
🥰🥰🥰 real madrid 🥰🥰🥰
2026-10-16 00:23:56
1
0195c4
اݪـــ𝆭ــیاس ݪیــــٰـوانے₇₁₉ :
2026-10-15 18:17:07
24
flavienmatondo331
øsnie øff :
😅😆😆😆😆😆😆😅hrt
2026-10-17 07:57:00
1
sky00539582043055
Sky00539582043055 :
😂😂😂😂😂
2026-10-15 19:09:35
6
aymen.neejadi
🇩🇿👑 𝙉.𝘼𝙮𝙢𝙚𝙣|أيمن 👑🧠 :
انا دائما العب دور لمنقذ هنا 😂😂😂
2026-10-15 20:34:51
5
onkgopotseokheo
onkgopotseokheo :
Real Madrid CF 🤍🥷
2026-10-17 10:09:36
2
benediction0972865273
Bénédiction Masereka :
hala Madrid
2026-10-16 08:53:46
6
user8635792704383
domingas Julieta salinga :
Hala Madrid para sempre
2026-10-21 22:10:28
1
vini.j756
neymar jr :
2026-10-15 21:33:34
1
barou8100
BAROU0G :
2026-10-18 09:56:38
1
samak.aramiya
Samakè Aramiya :
real madrid😅
2026-10-16 22:40:22
3
user5191851874588
user5191851874588 :
Real Madrid
2026-10-16 00:00:25
2
alexpharysh
Alex Pharysh :
hala Madrid 😅😅😅
2026-10-15 23:32:47
4
bitmoussa301
Oumarali :
2026-10-16 15:56:32
1
tony.armel.arakaz
Tony Armel ARAKAZA :
2026-10-16 14:42:35
1
user9684888110777
☠️😎👑🇵🇸👑😎☠️ :
2026-10-15 18:36:01
2
mande5649
Mande :
2026-10-15 21:42:25
1
ablayend3
Amadou Ndiaye :
2026-10-23 13:30:02
0
boy.diop975
🫀notti.🕊.osama.😎🫂☠️.dd😒 :
🥰🥰
2026-10-22 12:57:07
0
maicol.angulo89
Maicol angulo :
hala Madrid
2026-10-24 15:18:22
0
yen.yen3679
CR7 SUI @@@ :
ههههه
2026-10-23 04:08:20
0
use35627272737373
cheikh Diallo 🥷🥷🥷🥷😎😎😎😎 :
😂😂😂😂
2026-10-22 16:06:15
0
user86337249778356
خالد سعيد :
2026-10-16 03:12:49
0
To see more videos from user @izzane.animation, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

WHAT THE LAW SAYS EPISODE 4: CAN THE POLICE MAKE YOU UNLOCK YOUR PHONE? Every Thursday. Know it before they test it.
WHAT THE LAW SAYS EPISODE 4: CAN THE POLICE MAKE YOU UNLOCK YOUR PHONE? Every Thursday. Know it before they test it. "Unlock your phone." Four words. Suddenly the device that holds your banking, your private conversations, your photographs, your emails and your business becomes the centre of a police investigation, and somebody in uniform expects you to hand over access because he asked. Asking is all it is. A police investigation does not come with unlimited access to your digital life attached. Your phone is not a telephone. It is years of private messages, financial records, photographs, location history and conversations with people who have nothing to do with the offence being investigated, all of it about to be handled by someone who has decided it's his. Section 14 of the Constitution protects your privacy. Section 35 protects arrested, detained and accused people, including the right of an accused not to be forced into giving self-incriminating evidence. Those protections don't switch off when the blue lights come on. Neither does the law governing digital searches, and that law has a great deal to say about the officer's side of this. A PHONE CAN BE SEIZED. THAT DOES NOT MEAN EVERYTHING ON IT IS FAIR GAME. The Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 lets police seize articles reasonably believed to have been used in an offence or to contain evidence of one. Sections 20 and 23 cover seizures linked to an arrest. Taking the phone and opening the phone are two different acts. The first does not settle the legality of the second, however much the officer holding it would prefer otherwise. The Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020 deals specifically with searching for, accessing and seizing electronic devices and data. Section 29 provides for search warrants authorising access to identified articles and, where necessary, the use of passwords, decryption keys and other means of getting in. A warrant can also require a person named in it to assist, within the limits of what it grants. So Parliament understood that a phone is not a filing cabinet, and wrote rules for it. The rules come with conditions, and the conditions are the part that never makes it into the demand. A warrant is not a blank cheque to rummage through every corner of your life. What it says matters more than what the officer says. WHAT IF THEY SAY YOU MUST GIVE THEM YOUR PIN? This is where it gets interesting. Section 29(2)(h) of the Cybercrimes Act expressly allows a warrant to authorise the use of a password, decryption key or other information believed on reasonable grounds to be necessary to access an article identified in it. Section 29(3) lets a warrant require an investigator or another named person to assist with the search, to the extent the warrant specifies. Section 34 then creates a specific duty to assist for certain people who control material covered by an authorised search, and it excludes the one person the officer is most interested in: the person suspected of the offence. Read that again. The statute hands investigators the tools to get into a device, and then carves the suspect out of that particular duty. So no, the law does not hand every officer the PIN of every suspect on request. What he is relying on, what the warrant says, who you are in the matter and what the Constitution adds are questions he has to answer before you do. And learn to separate three things that get presented as one: a request, an instruction backed by lawful authority, and an officer simply announcing that you have no choice. Only the middle one comes with a section number.

About