Asked & Answered ⚖️
Region: US
Thursday 15 October 2026 19:01:26 GMT
8889
851
61
11
Music
Download
Comments
Noelle 🇨🇦 :
Omg, I watched this today and the whole time I was thinking, “This is what Sullivan should have done!” This judge exhausted all avenues before declaring a mistrial.
2026-10-15 21:17:15
29
sar :
sullivan just gave the impression he really couldnt be bothered
2026-10-15 19:12:43
69
Lawman75 :
Yeah, I think sullivan was extremely lazy when it came to this issue
2026-10-15 19:23:46
32
Missy_Jean_Davies :
He comes across like he found the the evidence himself
2026-10-16 13:13:00
1
iloveitaly55 :
Massachusetts actually uses particularly strong language in its reasonable doubt instructions, describing the standard as requiring “the highest degree of certainty possible in matters relating to human affairs.” While the legal burden of proof is the same nationwide, different wording could influence how jurors psychologically interpret reasonable doubt. That raises a legitimate question about whether Massachusetts jurors might be more hesitant to convict, potentially contributing to deadlocked juries and mistrials. Of course, that would need to be supported by actual data.
2026-10-16 10:37:32
3
Cfree4ever :
This judge definitely earned his paycheck and my RESPECT!!
2026-10-16 11:28:46
2
Janis 🎀 :
This is the point of alternates.
2026-10-15 20:06:46
31
imkeeksbitch :
what happened to sequestering and them not having any connection to the outside world while they are a juror? l
2026-10-15 20:36:34
5
as.el__ :
We live in hell. I literally cannot hear what he is accused of. My mind cannot comprehend that humans can do this.
2026-10-15 20:25:02
6
theinjectormimi :
So much evidence I can’t even think of an example
2026-10-16 00:42:20
7
delly79 🩷 :
ive been watching this trial everyday and yesterday was just mental,this is what judfe sullivan should of done but hey sullivan is just as corrupt as massachusettes law enforcemwnt
2026-10-16 04:27:42
3
buttons080 🇨🇦🍉 :
how are they able to sub in a new juror when both sides have concluded their cases? wouldn't the new juror be missing all the evidence presented by both sides?
2026-10-16 03:19:37
0
Justhereforthecomments :
I watched this in real time and I kept yelling in my head why the heck didn’t this happen in Lindsay’s case!! Then I heard through the grapevine is he’s a newer judge too! Which is nice to see
2026-10-15 23:43:15
7
Burns Blue :
I just saw another post about it being called a mistrial...I immediately came to you to see what you say...
2026-10-15 20:32:08
2
Pinik🇨🇦🇨🇦 :
What evidence dude
2026-10-15 19:33:53
3
Amanda Tidwell :
I watched all day today and every time he questioned another juror I thought of lindsey
2026-10-15 20:31:41
6
Sommer :
It’s hard to watch it.
2026-10-15 21:34:15
3
swiftie_nz🥝 Black Ferns Fan🏉 :
Just think how many people have gotten away with things by people skirting around the system like that
2026-10-16 06:56:26
1
Precious Posh :
Shocking right
2026-10-15 19:11:50
3
sweetcheeks1129 :
This is in NC
2026-10-15 20:06:36
1
alwaysblissful :
Good to see you again ❤️
2026-10-15 21:44:52
1
💚OBSERVER🤍 :
All the jurors in the LC Case were problematic
2026-10-15 20:22:59
9
Kreen :
The Clancy case needs to be written off and put down to experience and lessons learned because it was a shambles.
2026-10-15 19:18:11
11
Natalie N. :
Sullivan was a bit passive aggressive in my opinion. And this lone juror…🙄 show me the evidence sir! 🤦🏻♀️
2026-10-15 19:27:24
9
Chris Dennis :
This was not Massachusetts, surprisingly
2026-10-15 20:36:59
2
To see more videos from user @asked_answered, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
