@truecrimewithnatashac: Three victims’ families are represented in this filing. But the request covers phone data from ALL FOUR victims, including Xana Kernodle. That raises questions worth discussing. Relatives of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen and Ethan Chapin are asking a Washington court to stop Walla Walla from publicly releasing the forensic phone data described in their complaint. No member of Xana’s family is named as a petitioner, yet her phone data is included in the requested protection. Why does the request extend to Xana’s records? And why isn’t anyone from her family named in this case? We don’t know her family’s position from their absence in this filing. It would be wrong to assume they support or oppose the request. ⚖️ CAN SOMEONE OUTSIDE XANA’S FAMILY LEGALLY ASK FOR THIS? Washington law allows people named in records, or whom those records specifically concern, to seek protection from disclosure. The petitioners claim the phone data includes their own private communications and other sensitive information. Privacy interests can overlap across different people’s phones. But being allowed to ask does not automatically mean they are entitled to block every record. The court must determine what legal protections apply and whether the requested restrictions are justified. 🔎 HERE’S THE QUESTION I WANT TO DISCUSS: Could a targeted, redacted release of relevant timestamps or other timeline information help clarify disputed or unknown times while protecting the private information of the people objecting? I’m not asking for everyone’s unrelated personal conversations to become public. I’m asking whether there is a way to release information that answers legitimate questions while protecting information that has nothing to do with those questions. If appropriate redactions could address the privacy concerns, why seek to block the requested data from release? What information could legally be disclosed, and what specifically needs protection? The families cite privacy and harm from disclosure. That is their stated reason. We have not established a hidden motive, and releasing records would not necessarily end speculation. But the scope of this request deserves careful examination. Important: This post discusses the relief being requested. I have not verified a current court ruling granting or denying it. What do you think? Could a limited, redacted release serve both transparency and privacy? Keep the discussion respectful. Please like, comment, save and share so others can understand the questions this filing raises. Sources: Complaint, case 26-2-00735-36, pages 1–2 and 15–17; RCW 42.56.540. #Idaho4 #XanaKernodle #PublicRecords #TrueCrimeDiscussion #truecrimewithnatashacooper

True Crime With Natasha Cooper

Open In TikTok:

Region: US

Thursday 15 October 2026 22:02:17 GMT