1. Home
  2. Detail

@orng...nagekeo: Ma,e ghewo nona#lewatberandafypシ

___ustonwangge🇦🇷
___ustonwangge🇦🇷
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Friday 16 October 2026 11:51:57 GMT
469
41
0
2

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.45MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.45MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.45MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @orng...nagekeo, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#ملتياموغواړم📚
#ملتياموغواړم📚


Honey Just Turned Into a Baby Bee Queen?! #asmr #jellycreature #satisfyingvideos #fyp #ViralReels
Honey Just Turned Into a Baby Bee Queen?! #asmr #jellycreature #satisfyingvideos #fyp #ViralReels
مايصير! #foryoupage #fyp #foryou #CapCut #الكويت
مايصير! #foryoupage #fyp #foryou #CapCut #الكويت
sry অতীত মনে করে দেওয়ার জন্য আমার ও জ্বলে তাই একাই জ্বলমু কেন তাই তোগো দেখাইলাম 🤍🥲 . . . . . . .#mnijungkook #foryou #viral #bts
sry অতীত মনে করে দেওয়ার জন্য আমার ও জ্বলে তাই একাই জ্বলমু কেন তাই তোগো দেখাইলাম 🤍🥲 . . . . . . .#mnijungkook #foryou #viral #bts
RIVERS DPO REMOVED AFTER SUSPECTED CULTISTS RENOVATE POLICE OUTPOST AND CELEBRATE Port Harcourt, Rivers State | October 16, 2026 A police outpost in Abuloma, Rivers State, has become the centre of controversy after suspected confraternity members reportedly renovated the facility and returned to celebrate the completion of the project alongside police personnel. The incident prompted the Rivers State Police Command to condemn the gathering, warning that such an arrangement could undermine the integrity, discipline and professional standards expected of the Nigeria Police Force. According to reports, videos of the event circulated online, showing men gathered at the renovated outpost, taking photographs and celebrating. The footage sparked questions about how individuals suspected of belonging to an unlawful organisation were able to associate publicly with officers at a police facility. POLICE OFFICERS FACE INVESTIGATION Following the incident, the Rivers State Commissioner of Police, Olugbenga Adepoju, reportedly ordered the Divisional Police Officer responsible for Abuloma Division and the officer overseeing the outpost to be queried and relieved of their duties pending investigation. The decision was intended to establish how the renovation was organised, who authorised the work and whether any police personnel violated established procedures. However, the officers’ removal should not be interpreted as a final determination of guilt. The investigation is expected to establish the facts and determine whether disciplinary action is warranted. WHY THE RENOVATION SPARKED CONTROVERSY The controversy centres on the relationship between the police and the individuals who reportedly funded or carried out the renovation. While contributions from members of the public can help improve police facilities, the command stressed that such assistance must not compromise police independence or create the impression that suspected criminal organisations enjoy official recognition. The police also warned that renovating a public security facility does not confer legitimacy, acceptance or immunity from investigation on any group suspected of unlawful activities. The incident has therefore raised broader questions about transparency, public donations to security agencies and the safeguards required to prevent private contributions from compromising law enforcement. WHO FUNDED THE PROJECT? Several questions remain unanswered. Who financed the renovation? Were the appropriate authorities informed before the work began? Did officers know the identities of those involved? And were established procedures followed during the project and the subsequent celebration? These are among the issues investigators will need to clarify before responsibility can be conclusively determined. It is also important to distinguish between people appearing in the circulated footage and individuals whose involvement in criminal activity has been established through credible evidence. Suspicion alone does not prove membership of an unlawful organisation or criminal guilt. A LESSON FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT The Abuloma incident highlights the importance of maintaining public confidence in the police. Security agencies must be able to receive legitimate community support without creating doubts about their independence or impartiality. The investigation will determine whether any officers breached professional standards and whether further action is necessary. For now, the central issue remains straightforward: public contributions may improve facilities, but they must never compromise the credibility of the institution receiving them. Disclaimer: This report is for news and public-interest discussion. Allegations remain subject to investigation, and no individual should be considered guilty solely on the basis of suspicion or association. © Copyright remains the property of the respective owner(s). Please contact us via DM for proper credit or content removal requests.
RIVERS DPO REMOVED AFTER SUSPECTED CULTISTS RENOVATE POLICE OUTPOST AND CELEBRATE Port Harcourt, Rivers State | October 16, 2026 A police outpost in Abuloma, Rivers State, has become the centre of controversy after suspected confraternity members reportedly renovated the facility and returned to celebrate the completion of the project alongside police personnel. The incident prompted the Rivers State Police Command to condemn the gathering, warning that such an arrangement could undermine the integrity, discipline and professional standards expected of the Nigeria Police Force. According to reports, videos of the event circulated online, showing men gathered at the renovated outpost, taking photographs and celebrating. The footage sparked questions about how individuals suspected of belonging to an unlawful organisation were able to associate publicly with officers at a police facility. POLICE OFFICERS FACE INVESTIGATION Following the incident, the Rivers State Commissioner of Police, Olugbenga Adepoju, reportedly ordered the Divisional Police Officer responsible for Abuloma Division and the officer overseeing the outpost to be queried and relieved of their duties pending investigation. The decision was intended to establish how the renovation was organised, who authorised the work and whether any police personnel violated established procedures. However, the officers’ removal should not be interpreted as a final determination of guilt. The investigation is expected to establish the facts and determine whether disciplinary action is warranted. WHY THE RENOVATION SPARKED CONTROVERSY The controversy centres on the relationship between the police and the individuals who reportedly funded or carried out the renovation. While contributions from members of the public can help improve police facilities, the command stressed that such assistance must not compromise police independence or create the impression that suspected criminal organisations enjoy official recognition. The police also warned that renovating a public security facility does not confer legitimacy, acceptance or immunity from investigation on any group suspected of unlawful activities. The incident has therefore raised broader questions about transparency, public donations to security agencies and the safeguards required to prevent private contributions from compromising law enforcement. WHO FUNDED THE PROJECT? Several questions remain unanswered. Who financed the renovation? Were the appropriate authorities informed before the work began? Did officers know the identities of those involved? And were established procedures followed during the project and the subsequent celebration? These are among the issues investigators will need to clarify before responsibility can be conclusively determined. It is also important to distinguish between people appearing in the circulated footage and individuals whose involvement in criminal activity has been established through credible evidence. Suspicion alone does not prove membership of an unlawful organisation or criminal guilt. A LESSON FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT The Abuloma incident highlights the importance of maintaining public confidence in the police. Security agencies must be able to receive legitimate community support without creating doubts about their independence or impartiality. The investigation will determine whether any officers breached professional standards and whether further action is necessary. For now, the central issue remains straightforward: public contributions may improve facilities, but they must never compromise the credibility of the institution receiving them. Disclaimer: This report is for news and public-interest discussion. Allegations remain subject to investigation, and no individual should be considered guilty solely on the basis of suspicion or association. © Copyright remains the property of the respective owner(s). Please contact us via DM for proper credit or content removal requests.

About

Legal