Nick Powers
Region: US
Friday 16 October 2026 20:35:47 GMT
24255
3486
112
283
Music
Download
Comments
Malikae_ :
That’s why we should check the political integrity index instead of track aipac
2026-10-17 07:03:11
64
obamussy :
unfortunately i’m gonna need u to keep making this video every week until it’s all over leftists’ fyp
2026-10-18 06:08:32
25
user90756802510703 :
wow thank you i didn't understand this
2026-10-17 02:07:17
127
jack :
Wow, I didn’t know there was this much misinformation regarding aipac, kinda blew up my whole view on this shit, I really hope this video gets more traction.
2026-10-17 14:34:46
89
Tooniceforaname :
Also it should be noted that those green/red graphics have questionable methodology. At one point they would count “aipac” money as any money flowing from people who had previously donated to aipac or who donated to other groups who donated to aipac. It’s very weird.
2026-10-17 00:35:35
250
Sean Dekoda Phillips :
the last 5 or so years...I'm learning how much propaganda we're fed, daily, without our knowledge. it's actually insane.
2026-10-18 05:30:33
9
normalstardruid :
the real issue here is that, in general, people shouldn't make decisions based on singular 1x1 instagram formatted images. but they do. so I personally like the trend of those images pointing out things like "this candidate holds positions that you can only hold if you're incredibly compromised or insane"
2026-10-17 06:49:47
34
badday.goodday :
this is good info
2026-10-16 20:47:43
61
️ :
they can decline traditional pac money but not super pac money correct?
2026-10-17 18:49:41
1
Kyle Szczesny7 :
Wow thank you for this I had kind of just been blindly trusting that “track aipac” this was very informative
2026-10-17 15:28:58
10
📧m :
i did not know this….. wow
2026-10-18 23:11:27
3
My Home Puppies :
That explains some of the comments I heard from Republican candidates in the recent debates. Thank you for clarifying this for me.
2026-10-16 21:41:14
28
red.dawn :
Thank you for speaking out
2026-10-16 22:28:34
19
SeattleSuburbanDad206 :
Open secrets is top teir. They're the ONLY one I use for looking at contributions
2026-10-18 07:45:13
7
Giggles :
it's really black and white: people hate nuance 😜
2026-10-17 13:34:49
9
Jaronking :
I had no clue this was a thing.Thanks for telling I just thought they were getting the money to use as they see fit for the campaign.
2026-10-18 07:30:31
5
FreshFlowerOnly :
Thanks for the education. And yes always check Open Secrets and donate to them if u can.
2026-10-18 09:26:43
2
Carly :
Thank you! I learned something with this video!
2026-10-17 04:00:32
3
user7426005759011 :
Thanks for the info. Any good websites we should be looking at?
2026-10-17 08:05:36
2
sin :
U know the candidates have control, just not publicly
2026-10-17 00:25:05
4
jess :
THANK YOU! So important.
2026-10-17 12:11:44
1
anthony_nope :
you are doing good work
2026-10-17 17:35:06
0
GayDiveHappyHour :
Are there good data science methodologies for taking both campaign finance info and candidate voting/policy history to compare the money and behavior?
2026-10-18 21:13:27
0
Curt :
we should know the stance of politicians as it relates to how they feel about citizens United and pac's in general. we should also remove all the justices who sided with citizens United and appoint new justices because we can't trust them to not do what's best for the ultra wealthy.
2026-10-17 01:00:40
3
westdevx86 :
After you made your main point, the rest of the video I was waiting for you to bring up the counter example that loopholes do exist and can be exploited but was really disappointed you didn't do that. Not sure if that was bad faith, or maybe you forgot to include it, or simply weren't aware how much that would strengthen your argument. But loopholes most definitely exist and are actively exploited. It's not like there is some quantum force field between the Super PAC recipient and decisions about what happens to the money.
2026-10-17 20:37:16
0
To see more videos from user @thatnickpowersguy, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
