@thanhne016002: #bongchuyenphui #bongchuyenvadamme

Sinh Viên Năm 1
Sinh Viên Năm 1
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Sunday 18 October 2026 11:06:52 GMT
13684
407
18
89

Music

Download

Comments

chungtakhgsai
1m5 tập đá bóng :
bật nhiu cao dữ v cha
2026-10-18 12:26:05
1
ta.1104_
Dận em tới già 💢 :
hay quá a rttt
2026-10-18 12:10:16
0
thanhtinhh0
Thanh Tính :
quá tr roi a ơi
2026-10-18 12:13:31
0
phudai220505
Phú Đại 🏐 :
Đánh dữ vậy em ruột
2026-10-18 12:38:01
0
umsilabum54
Bin nì :
quá khủng
2026-10-19 04:31:06
0
_khanhdang.2
Khánh Đăng :
ko có tui sao chịu nổi
2026-10-18 12:36:41
0
minh.qun5591
Minh Quân :
ghê nhaa
2026-10-18 14:33:42
0
toan_tayy
toan_tayy.🏐🌊 :
Sân ở đoạn nào v ạ
2026-10-18 12:40:08
0
lndp_17
Học Ngu Cu Bá Khí :
Quá cọp rồi kkk 😁
2026-10-18 13:46:27
0
bientau7
Nào trả nợ 50tr thì đổi tên🐸 :
Cọp
2026-10-18 16:27:18
0
dang.triet96
Dang Triet :
nét quá
2026-10-18 12:58:07
0
To see more videos from user @thanhne016002, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

In case you missed it, there’s been turmoil in AI stocks, sparked by concern over Coreweave’s debt. Here’s exactly what you need to know about the neoclouds. A few things I couldn’t fit in the video:  1. The advance rate, meaning how much neoclouds can borrow relative to the amount of money they need to spend on Capex (to buy chips and equipment) can get QUITE high, in some cases 90-95%+ depending on the credit of the “off-taker”, so from Meta for example.  2. Asset backed financing and project financing (one of the groups I worked in at Morgan Stanley) isn’t new. What is unique about these GPU backed financings are the much shorter contract length; in the power world you often see power purchase agreements of 15-20 years and assets that have a much longer useful life (think a gas turbine). In a power deal, the debt is shorter than the PPA, and the PPA is shorter than the asset’s life, which leaves a long tail. Here the loan, the contract, and the asset useful life are much closer in length, so there is a shorter tail behind the debt.  Now in fairness to the neoclouds, after the off-taker's contracts end the same GPUs can be rented on an hourly basis at higher rates (at least right now) because demand for compute is so high. While Coreweave does have other types of debt, this structure accounts for over half and funded much of its massive growth over the past few years. They also have a decent amount of convertible debt, which is typically utilized by higher risk companies. 3. And finally what surprised me was the fact that on the other side, so if you look at an Anthropic’s balance sheet, “take or pay” agreements to buy the compute do not show up as a liability on the balance sheet, rather just shown as a footnote!! While this is consistent with accounting rules, it’s surprising.
In case you missed it, there’s been turmoil in AI stocks, sparked by concern over Coreweave’s debt. Here’s exactly what you need to know about the neoclouds. A few things I couldn’t fit in the video: 1. The advance rate, meaning how much neoclouds can borrow relative to the amount of money they need to spend on Capex (to buy chips and equipment) can get QUITE high, in some cases 90-95%+ depending on the credit of the “off-taker”, so from Meta for example. 2. Asset backed financing and project financing (one of the groups I worked in at Morgan Stanley) isn’t new. What is unique about these GPU backed financings are the much shorter contract length; in the power world you often see power purchase agreements of 15-20 years and assets that have a much longer useful life (think a gas turbine). In a power deal, the debt is shorter than the PPA, and the PPA is shorter than the asset’s life, which leaves a long tail. Here the loan, the contract, and the asset useful life are much closer in length, so there is a shorter tail behind the debt. Now in fairness to the neoclouds, after the off-taker's contracts end the same GPUs can be rented on an hourly basis at higher rates (at least right now) because demand for compute is so high. While Coreweave does have other types of debt, this structure accounts for over half and funded much of its massive growth over the past few years. They also have a decent amount of convertible debt, which is typically utilized by higher risk companies. 3. And finally what surprised me was the fact that on the other side, so if you look at an Anthropic’s balance sheet, “take or pay” agreements to buy the compute do not show up as a liability on the balance sheet, rather just shown as a footnote!! While this is consistent with accounting rules, it’s surprising.

About