Natedog :
Read the Bible it literally contradicts itself look into Genesis 1:3–5 and Genesis 1:14–19. It states "God" created light on the first day. Yet didn't create sun, moon, and stars until the fourth day? Stars are sources of light. The Sun is a star. Earth itself formed around 4.54 billion years ago, while the universe is approximately 13.8 billion years old. What specific evidence would convince you that your interpretation of creation is incorrect? A literal interpretation of the biblical creation chronology is commonly used to argue that Earth is only around 6,000–10,000 years old. That interpretation conflicts with overwhelming scientific evidence while when we ask for proof of God no one actually gives proof, hard facts not the "everything has a creator" or "nothing can't come from something" Saying "everything has a creator" immediately raises another question: Who created God? and the response is that God is eternal and doesn't need a creator, then why couldn't fundamental reality or the universe itself have an uncaused existence? Why does God get an exception to the rule? And saying "something can't come from nothing" doesn't prove God created the universe either. The Big Bang theory does not claim that the universe appeared out of absolute nothingness. It describes the early hot, dense state and subsequent expansion of the universe. Scientists are still investigating the ultimate origin of existence itself. Even if you could demonstrate that the universe had a cause, how would you demonstrate that the cause was conscious, intelligent, supernatural, and specifically the God described in the Bible? Those are several separate claims, and each requires evidence I'm not claiming science has answered every question. I'm saying that not knowing an answer does not automatically make a religious explanation correct.
2026-11-13 16:48:54