@shimmerycrystal: SPYLT High Protein Maple Donut Milk - Caffeinated Keto-Friendly Skim Milk Blend Protein Drink, 12 Cans (11 fl oz Each), Sugar-Free, Lactose-Free, Ready-to-Drink Workout Recovery Beverage

Crystal💊✝️🥉
Crystal💊✝️🥉
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Monday 19 October 2026 01:07:47 GMT
499
1
0
0

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @shimmerycrystal, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

November 3 is approaching. Governor Ned Lamont wants another term. Attorney General William Tong does, too. Meanwhile, a Connecticut professor’s discrimination complaint has been tied up in proceedings since 2020. Dr. Rachel Tambling alleged UConn paid her less than comparable male professors because of her sex. A state human rights referee dismissed her complaint in June 2026, finding nondiscriminatory reasons for the differences. But guess who’s appealing? CONNECTICUT’S OWN CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION. CHRO argues the referee misapplied the law and warns the ruling could undermine enforcement of Connecticut’s antidiscrimination statutes. And who’s representing UConn? ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM TONG’S OFFICE. OF FCKING COURSE. Defending state agencies is part of that office’s legal responsibility. But consider the situation. One state agency is challenging a civil rights decision. Another state office is representing the public university. And the woman who filed the complaint? SIX YEARS WITHOUT A FINAL RESOLUTION. No court has established discrimination. The appeals remain unresolved. NOW LET’S TALK ABOUT THE ELECTION. Both the governor’s office and attorney general’s office are on Connecticut’s November ballot. So we’re investigating questions their offices should be prepared to answer: How much public money has this litigation cost? What changes could prevent discrimination complaints from taking years to resolve? What oversight exists when public institutions face allegations from their own employees? And what specific reforms are the candidates proposing? Lamont has not been found personally responsible for this dispute. Tong’s office representing UConn does not itself establish wrongdoing. But elected officials can still be questioned about the systems they administer. NOVEMBER 3 ISN’T JUST ABOUT CAMPAIGN PROMISES. IT’S AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXAMINE THE PUBLIC RECORD. And we’re going to keep examining it. Sources: CT Post, Oct. 2, 2026; CHRO; Connecticut election records. #connecticutnews #uconn #equalpay #ctelection2026 #governmentaccountability
November 3 is approaching. Governor Ned Lamont wants another term. Attorney General William Tong does, too. Meanwhile, a Connecticut professor’s discrimination complaint has been tied up in proceedings since 2020. Dr. Rachel Tambling alleged UConn paid her less than comparable male professors because of her sex. A state human rights referee dismissed her complaint in June 2026, finding nondiscriminatory reasons for the differences. But guess who’s appealing? CONNECTICUT’S OWN CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION. CHRO argues the referee misapplied the law and warns the ruling could undermine enforcement of Connecticut’s antidiscrimination statutes. And who’s representing UConn? ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM TONG’S OFFICE. OF FCKING COURSE. Defending state agencies is part of that office’s legal responsibility. But consider the situation. One state agency is challenging a civil rights decision. Another state office is representing the public university. And the woman who filed the complaint? SIX YEARS WITHOUT A FINAL RESOLUTION. No court has established discrimination. The appeals remain unresolved. NOW LET’S TALK ABOUT THE ELECTION. Both the governor’s office and attorney general’s office are on Connecticut’s November ballot. So we’re investigating questions their offices should be prepared to answer: How much public money has this litigation cost? What changes could prevent discrimination complaints from taking years to resolve? What oversight exists when public institutions face allegations from their own employees? And what specific reforms are the candidates proposing? Lamont has not been found personally responsible for this dispute. Tong’s office representing UConn does not itself establish wrongdoing. But elected officials can still be questioned about the systems they administer. NOVEMBER 3 ISN’T JUST ABOUT CAMPAIGN PROMISES. IT’S AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXAMINE THE PUBLIC RECORD. And we’re going to keep examining it. Sources: CT Post, Oct. 2, 2026; CHRO; Connecticut election records. #connecticutnews #uconn #equalpay #ctelection2026 #governmentaccountability

About