I think the most realistic scenario is cloud models will start refusing to help people set up local models either because of their companies policies or federal restrictions, similar to how a cloud model won't help you print a pew pew. This won't work but it won't stop them from trying.
2026-10-19 20:08:30
3
Atmosphere :
💯 how long has piracy been banned?
2026-10-20 15:03:06
3
Magicianof33 :
I love your information! in this video you mentioned you can have a local model build itself. currently i am building one with qwen3:8b and Ollama though to build it for what i want i am using chatgpt to do so how would one move that sort of tbing fully locally. any information would be greatly appreciated!!!!
2026-10-19 21:39:47
1
J :
prohibition has failed in every human instance in history
2026-10-19 18:30:11
24
ross? :
I literally just opened up this app to look for your profile so I could ask the question, is there an effective way to train older models that you have downloaded to keep them current? Sort of a continuing education for your older models?
2026-10-20 16:38:11
4
FirstQuestion :
is anyone making the open source 2d printer?
2026-10-30 18:03:12
0
Jeremy S :
Probably already have one but which model are you using for local 3D modeling?
2026-10-19 18:32:49
2
Jamie Cropley :
When ChatGPT come about my first thought was they will make this illegal eventually 😂
2026-10-20 16:35:52
1
Robert Craig :
I think your argument is sort of true, but I think it's proper to think about bans as dissuading some amount of people. Just as, for example, DUI laws don't make it so that nobody ever drives drunk, we don't think those laws have failed. It's more accurate to talk about how much persuasive power those laws have. If you ban AI tools and 3d printers, it's absolutely true that there will be a group of people who work around those tools, but there will also certainly be people who would have used those tools but don't because it's either technically beyond them or too annoying. Also, it certainly dissuades business use. Absolutely agree re the geopolitical consequences, though, so if the only goal is to stop some possible bad actor from China or NK or whoever the boogeyman is, then yeah, bans are security Kabuki.
2026-10-19 19:05:26
2
Jives :
do you think we can get to a point of subbing adobe's ai for its processes with something like comfy ui working natively or how do you see that going with the whole craft runs?
2026-10-19 19:07:03
1
Hank Mobley :
they haven't even be able to ban things that everyone wants to be banned like Measels or Mosquitos
2026-10-20 10:29:03
0
Seth :
They can regulate the hardware. That’s about it. Math is math though.
2026-10-20 00:29:22
1
terraboops :
👏🏼 yes. this.
refreshing sensetalking.
2026-10-20 01:49:42
0
wootcrisp🇨🇦🇬🇧🇵🇸🌲 :
yeah man f Adobe for sure. gd that company
2026-10-19 23:38:27
0
Bryan Hart :
idk, it sounds a lot like the "bad guys will just get guns illegally, so we don't need background checks" argument.
there is some amount of regulation that will be beneficial.
but I will acknowledge that here the most effective regulation would probably be regarding worker protections rather than directly targeting ai.
2026-10-19 19:54:31
0
Brian 🇺🇸 :
The open weight models really are insanely good. Its been a bit since I've felt the need to use a US model.
2026-10-20 03:50:55
1
crrrnt :
so accurate
2026-10-19 18:17:38
0
Barry Michaelmore :
They locked down pirated music and film and look how that turned out
2026-10-19 18:19:38
4
anisotropic.reaction :
can't ban knowledge that has already been acquired
2026-10-19 22:17:20
0
deliciousnate :
Chuds in the spicy Nerf community are saying all the same stuff, except they think Republicans will somehow save them from Big Brother. They're doing some awesome and interesting work but they're almost all delusional
2026-10-20 09:59:34
0
sin :
💯
2026-10-19 22:03:58
0
To see more videos from user @cjtrowbridge, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.