@anonymousincthecrew30..0: #ANONYMOUSINCTHECREW30 #WETHEFUKINGPEOPLE

❌️ Chris Duncan ❌️ :

Shall has been defined by the courts as mandatory.

deborahsudduth3 :

was Spartanburg County in South Carolina think that they just adopted this international code is going to wipe away your Fourth Amendment rights your sixth Amendment rights annual 14th Amendment rights hopefully I'll be able to sue

❌️ Chris Duncan ❌️ :

Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26, 35 (1898): The United States Supreme Court explicitly ruled that the word "shall" is a mandatory command that normally creates an obligation impervious to judicial or administrative discretion. The court held that "shall" contrast sharply with the discretionary word "may." Alabama v. Bozeman, 533 U.S. 146, 153 (2001): The High Court reaffirmed that when a legal text utilizes the word "shall," the command is absolute. The court ruled that even if the violation of the "shall" directive seems minor or technically insignificant to the state, the word leaves zero room for a judge to craft a loophole or waive the requirement. Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 471–472 (1983): The Supreme Court established that the use of explicitly mandatory language—specifically the word "shall"—creates a binding liberty interest that the state is completely barred from infringing upon without violating fundamental due process.

Sammy Kirk 165 :

and they laugh at the constitution

. :

Chelsey1968 :

💯💯💯

🌺🔥 Cupixxia 🔥🌺 :

🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯

Terry Cook :

❤️❤️❤️