1. Home
  2. Detail

@mirraaaaa98: Em đã thấy#我看过#nhachaymoingay#nhactrungquoc#xhtiktok

tintin
tintin
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Thursday 22 October 2026 15:31:50 GMT
72079
6073
6
370

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (2.94MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.62MB) Watermark .mp4 (2.94MB) Music .mp3

Comments

mi.lo2583
yến nhi 🍃🌪 :
chỉ em cách lm đc hok ạ
2026-10-26 15:00:44
0
one2thr_
I don’t care :
Tình yêu là gì ?
2026-10-25 13:32:45
1
vann.ny15
TF-FAMILY🇨🇳 :
美丽的
2026-10-26 03:54:15
1
aptoyooo29
Toy🦆 :
2026-10-27 11:35:34
0
To see more videos from user @mirraaaaa98, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Stunning Ankara looks for my lovely ladies 👌😍#fashiontiktok #FYP #viral
Stunning Ankara looks for my lovely ladies 👌😍#fashiontiktok #FYP #viral
Thấy cưng quá trời du học sinh này 🫠 @Gemini Hùng Huỳnh @Tiệm Gấu Chérie #GeminiHungHuynh #DepMa #fyp #HungHuynh #tiemgaudepmachallenge
Thấy cưng quá trời du học sinh này 🫠 @Gemini Hùng Huỳnh @Tiệm Gấu Chérie #GeminiHungHuynh #DepMa #fyp #HungHuynh #tiemgaudepmachallenge
#halloweenlook #fyp #quesitos #viral
#halloweenlook #fyp #quesitos #viral
#kenyacomedy #trendingnow #creatorsearchinsights #ngazacomedy #fypシ゚viral
#kenyacomedy #trendingnow #creatorsearchinsights #ngazacomedy #fypシ゚viral
Belchen - der schönste Berg im Schwarzwald
Belchen - der schönste Berg im Schwarzwald
Most people think we have a right to vote. But according to the philosopher Jason Brennan, there is another right entirely: the right not to be governed badly. Brennan argues that a vote is not something you do just for yourself, because by voting, you are putting somebody in power over other people, and those people will have to live with the impact of your decisions for years and for years. Brennan argues that in most jobs or areas where our decisions hugely impact other people, like in a court of law or on a company's executive board, we expect those people to be capable and informed. If a juror in a criminal court wasn't listening, or didn't care, or knew nothing about the case, would we want them to decide over the life of a defendant? Why do we allow ill-informed voters to do exactly the same thing? Some people argue that voting makes people more engaged in the political system, but Brennan argues that voting actually increases partisanship. It makes us more divided and less willing to hear other people. Voting turns politics into a kind of sports game. For Brennan, the counterarguments are more practical than philosophical, because any competence test has to be designed by somebody with interests. And historically, every attempt to limit the franchise by capability was used to entrench the usual powers. But the questions that Brennan raises are important. Is voting the best way to create a government? Should we treat voting so lightly? Or should there be greater moral and legal consequences for anybody who puts somebody in power over others without thinking or doing their research first?
Most people think we have a right to vote. But according to the philosopher Jason Brennan, there is another right entirely: the right not to be governed badly. Brennan argues that a vote is not something you do just for yourself, because by voting, you are putting somebody in power over other people, and those people will have to live with the impact of your decisions for years and for years. Brennan argues that in most jobs or areas where our decisions hugely impact other people, like in a court of law or on a company's executive board, we expect those people to be capable and informed. If a juror in a criminal court wasn't listening, or didn't care, or knew nothing about the case, would we want them to decide over the life of a defendant? Why do we allow ill-informed voters to do exactly the same thing? Some people argue that voting makes people more engaged in the political system, but Brennan argues that voting actually increases partisanship. It makes us more divided and less willing to hear other people. Voting turns politics into a kind of sports game. For Brennan, the counterarguments are more practical than philosophical, because any competence test has to be designed by somebody with interests. And historically, every attempt to limit the franchise by capability was used to entrench the usual powers. But the questions that Brennan raises are important. Is voting the best way to create a government? Should we treat voting so lightly? Or should there be greater moral and legal consequences for anybody who puts somebody in power over others without thinking or doing their research first?

About

Legal