@sootherside:

𝘀𝗼𝗷𝘂 ໒꒱
𝘀𝗼𝗷𝘂 ໒꒱
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Thursday 22 October 2026 15:40:47 GMT
193663
30483
331
1087

Music

Download

Comments

hani.ahmad29
Hani Ahmad :
edannnnnnn,cuakep2 bgt mereka😭😭
2026-10-22 19:31:45
2273
hffahzhra_
jar :
this is the moment😝
2026-10-23 01:35:44
0
cakrakahani
yuleegg🪷🪷 :
rugiii bgt klo ga lari ke series 😭😭
2026-10-22 22:42:29
856
levinapalupi
Lvn :
liat pak henry seger bangettt bener² bau² duit
2026-10-23 00:24:21
572
mamahmudaa_anakduaa2
akuseorangibuanakdua :
mukanyaa syegerr syeeggerr bgttt kaya esss buuahhhh🤭🤣
2026-10-23 01:13:19
481
vvvhaa
Vh :
outfit gini davina mirip bgt sama mama medina🥰
2026-10-22 21:25:41
170
kaaan.ss
kan :
Baba shining bgt malem ini gakuadddd😭😭😭
2026-10-22 23:08:40
137
harlinaa_001
harlina.ladasii :
love you🫰🫰
2026-10-22 22:29:05
0
kristinaaja
Hotcream :
Gonggggg00
2026-10-23 13:51:17
0
tantannn009
pecintatiramisyuuu :
"ternyata sena anak konglomerat" kita udah tau dri dlu dav😭
2026-10-23 03:35:58
96
mbaikoh09
Em :
bener bener mirip Medina atas bawah cwaaaakeeep
2026-10-22 23:09:12
67
evian01_06
One June :
Sama jas ijo aja dap
2026-10-23 00:30:43
27
mocielt
Moci🍓 :
Mrka semua old money
2026-10-22 22:13:14
37
emy.1917
Moy ⚘.ᥫ᭡⋆ :
Muka sena berubah2, cocok jd apa ajaa.. tukang ketoprak, intel, pewarisss🥰
2026-10-22 23:35:49
41
fenfen.2
feeennnn :
gilsss cakepp bangetttt merekaaa 😍
2026-10-22 23:37:19
13
nida_11.11
susi nida :
alurny tertata rapih bnget dari awal GK terburu2 juga tersusun bnget alurnya,mknya dari episode 1 GK pernh skip nontonnya🥰
2026-10-23 01:57:35
91
_owl25
_owl :
Sena kamu itu ganteng yang ganteng bangett 😭😂 *brb selak bojoku eruh
2026-10-22 23:12:27
14
lai01921
suka suka saya :
buset auranya gong banget
2026-10-23 01:04:28
5
raisyanabila876
raisya nabila muhmmd :
Bener bener gong gooooooooong ini flm GK main main oppaaaaaaa😂😂😂🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2026-10-22 21:33:33
7
anggii3_
A :
visual mereka GOONGGGG BANGETT😍😍😍😍
2026-10-23 01:30:34
5
silvidwisaf
Mamileyaa💋 :
yg dari awal bilang pak henry ga cocok jadi bpk nya sena, sebadaiii ini pdhal cocok bgt mereka😭
2026-10-23 01:20:35
9
syiinnnnnnnnnnn
syiinnnnnnnnnnn :
deeymmm!!😍 gini dulu awal muncul banyak yang ga terima yang jadi henry beliau👀
2026-10-23 01:28:01
50
risa19967
Risa1996 :
masyaAllah orang HAVE pada ngumpul🥰
2026-10-22 23:13:42
5
alda_rante
@ald.sky :
kak boleh SV fotonya 1 gak demen banget 😭🙏
2026-10-23 07:09:20
0
ini.aice_
ayysiii :
2026-10-22 23:24:15
1
To see more videos from user @sootherside, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Is having an investment account in your child’s name really a non-negotiable requirement? 🔍 The debate around investing Child Benefit, and how the Small Gift Exemption interacts with modern investing platforms, has brought up a fundamental question in Irish tax: Where does substance end and form begin? A lot of commenters have called my position uneducated, unqualified, and inaccurate.  So let’s look at the actual facts, evidence, and legal precedents - specifically Determination 04TACD2024 from the Tax Appeals Commission. In tax law, what matters most is the balance of probability evidential hurdle - proving that what you’re saying is more likely to be true than not. Out of the six observations Revenue made regarding absent evidence in 04TACD2024: 📍 5 out of 6 would be satisfied under clear record-keeping and non-commingled funds. 📍 The only missing piece? Having the investment platform account strictly in the child’s name. But with low-cost modern platforms simply not supporting child accounts, parents are often forced into high-fee life company products just to tick a box. 💡 In accounting, we look at substance over form - the economic reality of a transaction.  If a parent can clearly demonstrate earmarked, unmixed, tax-exempt gifts invested on behalf of a child, shouldn't that evidence hold weight? Drop your thoughts below. And remember, there are no egos here, only a search for truth! 👇 📌 Save this post as a reference for your own tax and gifting considerations.
Is having an investment account in your child’s name really a non-negotiable requirement? 🔍 The debate around investing Child Benefit, and how the Small Gift Exemption interacts with modern investing platforms, has brought up a fundamental question in Irish tax: Where does substance end and form begin? A lot of commenters have called my position uneducated, unqualified, and inaccurate. So let’s look at the actual facts, evidence, and legal precedents - specifically Determination 04TACD2024 from the Tax Appeals Commission. In tax law, what matters most is the balance of probability evidential hurdle - proving that what you’re saying is more likely to be true than not. Out of the six observations Revenue made regarding absent evidence in 04TACD2024: 📍 5 out of 6 would be satisfied under clear record-keeping and non-commingled funds. 📍 The only missing piece? Having the investment platform account strictly in the child’s name. But with low-cost modern platforms simply not supporting child accounts, parents are often forced into high-fee life company products just to tick a box. 💡 In accounting, we look at substance over form - the economic reality of a transaction. If a parent can clearly demonstrate earmarked, unmixed, tax-exempt gifts invested on behalf of a child, shouldn't that evidence hold weight? Drop your thoughts below. And remember, there are no egos here, only a search for truth! 👇 📌 Save this post as a reference for your own tax and gifting considerations.

About