@nathanespinozaidk:

￴￴￴oj.visuals :

defo talking about bmedia

axoromero :

“I like this and others don’t so others are miserable”

lui :

he says this in a tesla

Duo Lingo :

The nothing headphones just suck, for the price they’re at there are tons of better options for the average consumer

edgar.mou :

“Bump the bass & Treble” Brother the bass does NOT need bumping 😭😭😭

blaze :

dude, thirty bucks iems are better than those

Nathan Espinoza :

bro enjoys life??

Nnif Boots47🚦 :

To be fair, the graph shows whats best for the AVERAGE person.

harshith :

this guy just consumerism pro max

Pop Bob :

Just cuz you aren’t buying for perfect audio doesn’t mean you needed to settle for mid stuff lol. The point is you can get better quality for less money and for the price you are paying you are getting way less than the competition in this ccase lol

Sixx :

399$ for headphones that are blown out of the water by headphones that are less than half the price. That's why they are hating on them.

Aliengardina :

Nit picking to its finest dude, these headphones are OBJECTIVELY HORRIBLE, they dont sound the same from person to person the skynd profile is all over the place its some shit you see is ROSS headphones, and I dont understand how you can form such general opinion like when you said " wired earbuds are terrible"

Apechico 🏳️‍⚧️💃💃 :

You’re allowed to like something that is objectively bad. It’s subjective vs objective.

svkeulen :

Once you listen to proper headphones you’ll get it

Wxst :

the graph represents what sounds good to the average person. if you like the headphones, that cool and all but we can still criticize them lmao. relax

Maximan :

for that price. yeah it's bad

abscond :

“Yeah i’m gonna bump the treble and bass up a bit”

makmal :

Please educate yourself on why people are complaining. It's not that the headphones don't achieve a "perfect tune"- such a thing doesn't exist. It's the variation that is an issue. The variation of tuning from one NOTHING headphone to another is so far that not even EQ-ing can save it. It's so bad testers thought it was more than 2 different headphones. Consumers don't and can't know what they will get, which is a scam for something with this price tag.

cloudrak :

bait used to be believable, wasting 400 dollars for terrible sound

valiomaito :

Vro they're objectively bad

rolldice1 :

Karina :

Tesla fanboys when you don’t wanna praise the piss sound headphones that cost 400 bucks just because they look funky

pune :

all they said was they suck?

M1szQo :

Bruh its because its 400$ ur getting scammed just because they look kinda cool if u need noise cancellation just get airpods pro that SOUND better and thats hard to believe

ganish :

bros hurt cs what experts find bad, he finds great