Swoo stii 🫶
Region: AU
Saturday 24 October 2026 12:00:03 GMT
481
79
9
9
Music
Download
Comments
Prativa sen :
Lyrics bujina
2026-10-24 17:04:56
0
Chahana Gahatraj :
2026-10-24 12:36:57
0
👑Vivek👑 :
2026-10-24 12:47:30
0
SHRIS_TI :
2026-10-24 12:11:22
0
👑Vivek👑 :
2026-10-24 12:46:20
0
Sim🌸 :
👀❤️
2026-10-24 17:13:59
0
abu baker :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰💋
2026-10-24 12:08:14
0
🐯 TIGER 🐯 :
♥️♥️♥️
2026-10-24 12:05:57
0
sabitra.kc09 :
🥰❤️❤️💝💝💝
2026-10-24 15:52:14
0
To see more videos from user @swoostii98765, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![⚖️ DISHONESTY IN FAMILY COURT CAN HAVE CONSEQUENCES. A mother has been ordered to pay £27,109.75 towards a father’s legal costs following Family Court proceedings involving allegations of sexual abuse. The allegations were not proved. But this costs order was NOT simply because the allegations failed. The judge found that the mother had acted unreasonably, including embellishing evidence and being dishonest in some of her reporting while building and maintaining the case against the father. Importantly, the court also made clear that she had not deliberately concocted the allegations or coached the child, and that parents with genuine safeguarding concerns should not be frightened to raise them. The distinction matters: ❌ An allegation being unproved does not automatically mean costs. ⚖️ But unreasonable litigation conduct, dishonesty and embellishment can have consequences. The father was described by the judge as having been “sorely wronged.” FAZ v MAZ & Anor (Costs) [2026] EWFC 301 — 19 October 2026 An allegation is not a finding. And evidence still matters. #FamilyCourt #FathersRights #FamilyLawUK #FalseAllegations #MindBeforeMuscle](/video/cover/7699374494133112086.webp)
