@wheightman: WAS TAKING RAPHINHA OFF A BIG MISTAKE BY HANSI FLICK? In my opinion, Raphinha should have played the full 90 minutes! As long as Raphinha was on the pitch, he dropped deeper whenever Real Madrid attacked, helping Barcelona maintain control of the ball and support the team defensively. His presence was important. But just two minutes after Raphinha was substituted, Barcelona conceded a goal! The big question is: Was taking him off really the right decision? Shouldn't Hansi Flick have considered playing for a draw at that moment? Barcelona were six points ahead of Real Madrid. Wouldn't it have been wiser to protect that advantage and secure at least one point rather than take unnecessary risks? I understand that Flick always wants his team to fight for victory. But is taking risks in every situation really necessary? Sometimes, adapting to the circumstances and accepting a draw can also be a smart tactical decision. My question is simple: Wouldn't it have been better to keep Raphinha on the pitch and try to maintain control of the game instead of making an attacking substitution?
