@_the4doors: "Being wronged and having a §1983 claim are NOT the same thing. Consider this hypothetical example: Here's a hypothetical. Somebody walks out of a public office with a letter in their hand. They were expecting an explanation. Instead, the letter says their request is denied. They call three times, get three different answers, and leave convinced a constitutional violation happened. They open their laptop and start a federal lawsuit with the words 'fraud,' 'retaliation,' and 'due process' in big letters. But when they try to point to the particular federal right, the exact action of a particular person, and the record supporting it, they hit three blank spaces. The frustration is real. The legal theory is not finished. A careful review may reveal a viable federal claim, a state-law issue, an appeal, or no actionable violation on those facts. Those outcomes are not interchangeable. The goal isn't to talk somebody out of asking questions. It's to make sure the questions lead somewhere that the law recognizes. People can treat you terribly and still leave you without the kind of federal claim you think you have. That is a hard thing to hear when you're the one dealing with the consequences. But I would rather somebody understand that up front than spend weeks writing a complaint that never identifies the actual right involved. Section 1983 is a civil remedy tied to the deprivation of rights secured by federal law or the Constitution by somebody acting under color of state law. That means the questions are specific: What right? What conduct? Which person? How are the two connected? A long description of disrespect, unfairness, or frustration does not automatically answer those questions. Before you write pages of conclusions, write four lines: the exact act; who did it; the federal right you believe was affected; and the record that supports your account. If you cannot fill in one of those lines, that is a research assignment, not a reason to guess. Then check whether the proposed remedy is actually available under the law. Don't mistake a useful research worksheet for a finding that your rights were violated. The facts, applicable law, defenses, and deadlines still have to be examined. My §1983 class uses a case study and templates to teach how to organize that process. Comment 1983 and I’ll point you to the class details. #The4Doors #1983Class #CivilRightsEducation #DueProcess"

There are no more comments for this video.

To see more videos from user @_the4doors, please go to the Tikwm homepage.