@1968080425072020.1am: #quran #قران_كريم #quran_alkarim #قران #قران_كريم_ارح_سمعك_وقلبك الشيخ الطبلاوي @تلاوات_نادره📻🎧 @أرح قلبك🤍

الكلمة الطيبة
الكلمة الطيبة
Open In TikTok:
Region: DZ
Tuesday 27 October 2026 18:05:17 GMT
2794
491
13
15

Music

Download

Comments

nooralimaniman
🍂🌺-نور الأيمان-🕋🌺🍂 :
2026-10-27 18:08:20
1
fatimazahrallem
Fatima Zahra :
لااله الا الله محمد رسول الله
2026-10-27 19:00:06
0
o00flower00o
lotus flower :
2026-10-27 18:06:43
0
nooralimaniman
🍂🌺-نور الأيمان-🕋🌺🍂 :
2026-10-27 18:08:16
1
nooralimaniman
🍂🌺-نور الأيمان-🕋🌺🍂 :
2026-10-27 18:08:14
1
oumousidibe66
Mme Tamboura :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-10-27 20:08:54
0
casemirotraore
@Bradley_##Tr :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-10-27 18:28:20
1
omar.tour283
Omar Diop :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-10-27 20:19:27
0
To see more videos from user @1968080425072020.1am, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Donald Trump has sparked a major debate after saying, “We’ve given a lot to Ukraine. They’ve given nothing to us.” He was talking about the billions of dollars the United States has spent supporting Ukraine during its war with Russia. Trump’s argument is simple: American taxpayers have spent a huge amount of money, while Ukraine has not directly paid the U.S. back with money, military equipment, or other resources. He has also pointed to problems such as higher fuel and diesel prices as costs Americans have faced. Supporters of Trump say the U.S. should focus more on its own problems. They argue that American weapons, money, and military supplies could instead be used to strengthen U.S. defenses and help Americans at home. But critics say the idea that Ukraine has given America “nothing” is too simple. They point to Ukraine’s history and its role in U.S. national security. In 1994, Ukraine agreed to give up the nuclear weapons it inherited after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The U.S., Britain, and Russia then gave Ukraine security assurances under the Budapest Memorandum. There is also a major strategic argument. American weapons have helped Ukraine fight Russia without American troops directly fighting Russian forces. Supporters of this view say Ukraine has weakened a major U.S. rival while reducing the need for Americans to enter a direct war. Another point is that much of the money approved for Ukraine does not simply leave the United States. A significant portion is spent inside America, including on weapons made by U.S. defense companies. This helps replenish American weapons stocks and supports jobs in the defense industry. The bigger debate is about what counts as a “return” for America. Trump is looking at the relationship mainly through money and direct benefits. His critics argue that national security, weakening an adversary, protecting European stability, and preventing wars from spreading are also benefits.
Donald Trump has sparked a major debate after saying, “We’ve given a lot to Ukraine. They’ve given nothing to us.” He was talking about the billions of dollars the United States has spent supporting Ukraine during its war with Russia. Trump’s argument is simple: American taxpayers have spent a huge amount of money, while Ukraine has not directly paid the U.S. back with money, military equipment, or other resources. He has also pointed to problems such as higher fuel and diesel prices as costs Americans have faced. Supporters of Trump say the U.S. should focus more on its own problems. They argue that American weapons, money, and military supplies could instead be used to strengthen U.S. defenses and help Americans at home. But critics say the idea that Ukraine has given America “nothing” is too simple. They point to Ukraine’s history and its role in U.S. national security. In 1994, Ukraine agreed to give up the nuclear weapons it inherited after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The U.S., Britain, and Russia then gave Ukraine security assurances under the Budapest Memorandum. There is also a major strategic argument. American weapons have helped Ukraine fight Russia without American troops directly fighting Russian forces. Supporters of this view say Ukraine has weakened a major U.S. rival while reducing the need for Americans to enter a direct war. Another point is that much of the money approved for Ukraine does not simply leave the United States. A significant portion is spent inside America, including on weapons made by U.S. defense companies. This helps replenish American weapons stocks and supports jobs in the defense industry. The bigger debate is about what counts as a “return” for America. Trump is looking at the relationship mainly through money and direct benefits. His critics argue that national security, weakening an adversary, protecting European stability, and preventing wars from spreading are also benefits.

About