☭MeowUnist :
I want to preface with unironic friendly tone tag here, because you don’t seem malicious? Or something??? But this is the most unapologetic, incredibly, baffling statement I’ve heard in a while. I think you’ve misunderstood what communism is, and what it seeks to do. And so, it’s pretty evident you haven’t read Marx, and too, misinterpret what he means and how he’s related to it as a whole. Half the things you talked about here I could tell you Marx has talked on. You say he’s detached from modern society, yet you wouldn’t know? you haven’t seen what he had to say ? He Is not the end all be all, good job for knowing that. but he is our foundation in what we use to form our frameworks. Our basis of thought. You’re trying to apply your understanding of peoples continuation and interpretations off of Marx’s work, as the very foundation for the theory to interpreted in the first place. People don’t need to read “the 200 year old work” in math, but before they know advance calculus, they must learn algebra. To know math, you must know Newton and what he had said, which is to say, his formulas. Political science are a bit different from a mathematical one. You can talk about the contexts in, VERY namely, something like CAPTIAL, but it’s going to be incredibly hard to concisely, and most importantly, accurately condense **MULTIPLE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PAGES**. I mean, unless you want to just copy and paste what he has said, and then add something like fucking footnotes, there isn’t someone out there making -Capital(by David davidsmen)-
2026-10-28 04:29:13