CalMatters
Region: US
Tuesday 27 October 2026 21:19:34 GMT
6217
369
13
40
Music
Download
Comments
Musiclover89 :
I voted no. Billionaires can pay for their own research
2026-10-27 21:29:52
56
Leslie :
I struggled with this one, but ultimately the fact that the main sponsor would receive the lion’s share of the funds pushed me to vote no. It’s like Michelson basically bought a bill to fund his own institute. There are better ways to make research funding available without earmarking such a huge portion of the money for only one place.
2026-10-28 02:32:56
23
BMO :
Basically. The state (taxpayers) is going to take out $8billion in loans and give $4billion to one guys “charity”.
2026-10-28 06:48:53
0
FelineGood :
It is not recent; it is written in the proposition. That is why I said...
2026-10-28 05:23:11
0
user :
absolutely NOT, especially if they're not gonna hire people and pocket the money for themselves
2026-10-28 05:33:07
5
sav777777888 :
No on 38.
2026-10-28 06:10:23
1
querquobad2 :
No on prop 38
2026-10-27 21:33:27
28
EMonty :
Yeah, that was a big NO! It’s not fair to the rest of Ca research scientists!
2026-10-28 03:55:12
3
70la_lisa :
I’m voting no! Funds don’t seem to benefit those who need them. Voting no on props that incur debt.
2026-10-28 04:01:59
0
ceo_greg4 :
No on 38
2026-10-28 03:26:31
0
Chris :
@Julian hopefully good info on the prop!
2026-10-27 23:01:49
1
To see more videos from user @calmatters, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
