so, Jarvis is not made by tony? is marvel retcon ?
2026-10-28 10:55:07
327
ObadInfante :
pretty much white people stealing the work of black people again and again. that's crazy.
2026-10-28 19:26:00
13
Scotttyyyboyyy :
this show has kinda showed the future of ai and how scary is can be...
2026-10-29 00:50:27
0
elifox0912 :
Blasphemy silently done …taken from God when asked his name, which he said “I am”
2026-10-28 15:49:29
18
Natcritfail :
the problem with this was we see in iron man 1 tony made jarvis as a kid and then kept upgrading him which is why he's Tony's personal AI so they retconned that and it feels like a weird choice cause it didn't have to be Jarvis it could have just been another AI
2026-10-28 10:34:16
385
Zack :
If I’m wrong flame me for this, but I don’t ever remember Stark saying in any of the movies that HE actually created Jarvis? We’re just introduced to Jarvis as a program in Iron Man.
2026-10-28 13:05:16
41
Worships xim :
I think therefore I am, I AM
2026-10-28 08:10:16
318
_simply-_-Emd :
Because Stark always makes Enemies… even in death
2026-10-28 16:34:09
13
Chelsea’s Page :
I’m seeing people were under the impression that Tony alone made Jarvis and truth be told. I thought he did too, but this does make sense because Stark was a weapons manufacturer. He wasn’t really working in AI maybe eventually he would have but he probably saw Jo Casta work and use that as the foundation to finish or make Jarvis.
2026-10-28 14:19:46
7
🧿🌙Dani_Amazonian🪐🧿 :
Vision is a mixed boy lmao 🤣😭
2026-10-28 13:03:43
49
jackdanielblacksmith :
so basically made everything stark done black iron heart Jarvis shit he shouldn't have stopped the snap
2026-10-28 07:16:14
21
tikblanktok :
It bothers me that the ethical implications of this are literally not acknowledged at all. Like, it was one thing when Jarvis was just a science fiction AI companion that was used as the foundation for an actual, sentient being, but implying that literally all of these AIs that we've ever seen have been conscious the whole time is crazy. They were literally using sentient digital slaves. Did no one writing this think about that?
2026-10-28 11:50:16
90
TheStrangegamer :
yall need to know he did create the ai's she only made the base code but she was betrayed by her company who sold the base for ai to Tony witch he used to make Jarvis,Friday,and Edith and a bunch of others that never got used or really showed up in the movies or shows
2026-10-28 12:00:03
63
Whiting :
Why do all the new spin offs just try to under cut stark?
2026-10-28 11:36:00
70
Birdy :
I AM
2026-10-28 10:20:53
13
mochi :
so why would Tony bother with dumee and u if he wasn't creating AI?
2026-10-28 10:34:39
13
Brandon :
And like somebody said in the comments here, Tony never actually states he created Jarvis. We just all assume he did.
2026-10-28 16:03:19
5
_t46 :
The only reason I’m not mad at this is because Stark created time travel had he not done that I’d feel it’d undermine his intelligence
2026-10-28 12:34:56
9
JC :
it really doesn't under cut. inventors do this all the time build upon something an improve it. plus it goes with Tony's characters prior to ironman 1
2026-10-28 12:53:14
6
coolmonkey671 :
So another change that makes no sense as it was made out that Tony made Jarvis and the code but now he didn’t make any of it
2026-10-28 19:01:41
2
🌸 Odessa 🌸 :
Which ironically Vision’s mom is Jocasta now 🤦♀️
2026-10-28 20:38:16
1
kingsley :
another stark downplay from marvel btw
2026-10-28 21:39:00
2
Blueshitbox95 :
So this was made to under cut stark? When through comics he is the sole creator. Of JARVIS and now it was a bald woman? That makes no sense.
2026-10-28 18:37:39
0
ShaunTDawg :
the other people streal everything and take all the credit
2026-10-28 15:02:12
0
DOzburn :
This is the most Disney bs thing since she hulk
2026-10-28 14:26:43
0
To see more videos from user @joepapireviews, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.