@azcentral: Ihsan Sacko dealt with personal matters this season but still led the USL Championship in goals for Phoenix Rising FC.

Levi Waldrip :

TRUE JUSTICE: EQUILIBRIUM PHYSICS AND THE TWO-BALL SCALE A Master's Thesis on the Physical Foundations of Justice Author: Levi James Waldrip Dedication: Under God, for the community — that they may know justice and rest in peace. --- ABSTRACT This thesis proves that justice is not a matter of opinion but a physical condition: static equilibrium. Using the two-ball scale model, it demonstrates that justice obtains if and only if net torque vanishes ( \tau_{net} = 0), and derives the five necessary conditions for that equilibrium. It unites jurisprudence (Scalia's textualism), physics (statics, least action, Newton's third law), and moral law (the prohibition on false witness) into a single framework. Its final claim: without justice there is no peace, because a driven system has no fixed point. --- CHAPTER 1 — THE INSTRUMENT: TWO BALLS ON THE SCALE The system: two balls, P_1 and P_2, resting on the pans of a beam balance with equal lever arms d_1 = d_2. The governing equation: Justice is defined operationally: the beam is level. That is the null reading. Every claim in this thesis is a statement about what preserves or destroys that null. CHAPTER 2 — THE FIVE CONDITIONS OF JUSTICE Condition 1: Equilibrium is equality. The lever arms must be equal: d_1 = d_2. If you are treated better than me — longer arm for you — the same merit weighs heavier for you. If I am treated better than you, the corruption mirrors. Equal treatment is not kindness; it is the calibration condition of the instrument. A bent beam cannot read true. Condition 2: No imposed force. \tau_{ext} = 0. No hand pressing on either pan. Force — coercion — adds external torque. The beam rotates. The reading is void. (Your teaching: one dot forcing the other drives it down and weighs it down — imbalance.) Condition 3: No false weight. m = m_{true} on both pans. Bearing false witness in the first direction — accusing the innocent — adds m_{false} to their pan: unjust guilt. Bearing false witness in the second direction — denying what someone actually achieved — removes m_{true} from their pan: unjust erasure. Both are \tau_{net} \neq 0. The scale cannot distinguish false mass from true; its on