@aku.aremanita.73:

aku aremanita 73

Open In TikTok:

Region: US

Wednesday 28 October 2026 11:20:14 GMT

53

7

0

0

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (8.85MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (5.19MB) Watermark .mp4 (7.61MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.

To see more videos from user @aku.aremanita.73, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

trump trivia

There is no one like our God! #HowGreatThouArt What a joy having our good friend @MichaelBethany leading with us this weekend! What on YouTube (link in profile) and join us in worship. #Worship #Hymn #christiantiktok #church

rlqyzim’🦇 #freefire #highlight #ap #fyp #sensi

rlqyzim’🦇 #freefire #highlight #ap #fyp #sensi

60% of the voters. 40% of the seats. Same people. Same votes. Different lines. How does that even happen? Start with the dots. There are 50 equal-size precincts in this simplified example: 30 blue and 20 red. Blue represents Democrats and red represents Republicans. That gives blue 60% of the voters and red 40%. If you only look at the total, blue has the majority. But a statewide vote total and the number of districts won are two different measurements. Now divide those same dots into five districts, with ten dots in each. In the first district map, every district contains six blue precincts and four red precincts. Blue wins each local contest, so blue gets all five seats. That's 60% of the voters producing 100% of the seats. Then redraw the boundaries without moving a single dot. Put twenty blue precincts into two districts. Blue wins both of those districts by huge margins. The remaining ten blue precincts are spread across three districts alongside twenty red precincts. Red wins those three districts. The result: blue wins two seats, red wins three. The side with 40% of the voters now gets 60% of the seats. Nobody changed parties. Nobody moved. Nobody added a vote or took one away. The grouping changed. This is the mechanism behind gerrymandering: drawing electoral districts to give a side an advantage in how votes become seats. The two moves to watch are packing and cracking. PACKING means concentrating your opponents into a small number of districts they win overwhelmingly. Winning one district by a giant margin still gives you one seat. Those extra votes do not spill into the district next door. CRACKING means spreading your opponents across enough districts that they keep falling short. They can be a substantial group overall and still lose each of those separate contests. Look closely at the three red-winning districts in the animation. Two contain four blue precincts and six red precincts. The third contains two blue and eight red. Blue loses all three even though the same electorate has a blue majority overall. That is why the shape of the map matters. The election is being counted inside boundaries, and the boundaries decide which voters are counted together. There is a second trap here: the map where blue wins every seat is not automatically a fair map just because blue has more voters. A 60% vote share does not become proportional representation when it produces a 100% seat share. The comparison shows how much the grouping can change the outcome. The state labels make the different layouts easier to follow. California, New York and Texas are used as illustrative examples, not claims about their actual district maps, vote shares or numbers of seats. Real precincts contain mixed political preferences, and real districts involve many more people. These equal-size, single-party dots deliberately simplify that mess so you can isolate one variable: the lines. The name also has a very literal backstory. In Massachusetts in 1812, Governor Elbridge Gerry signed a redistricting law. A district was mocked as looking like a salamander. Gerry plus salamander gave us

60% of the voters. 40% of the seats. Same people. Same votes. Different lines. How does that even happen? Start with the dots. There are 50 equal-size precincts in this simplified example: 30 blue and 20 red. Blue represents Democrats and red represents Republicans. That gives blue 60% of the voters and red 40%. If you only look at the total, blue has the majority. But a statewide vote total and the number of districts won are two different measurements. Now divide those same dots into five districts, with ten dots in each. In the first district map, every district contains six blue precincts and four red precincts. Blue wins each local contest, so blue gets all five seats. That's 60% of the voters producing 100% of the seats. Then redraw the boundaries without moving a single dot. Put twenty blue precincts into two districts. Blue wins both of those districts by huge margins. The remaining ten blue precincts are spread across three districts alongside twenty red precincts. Red wins those three districts. The result: blue wins two seats, red wins three. The side with 40% of the voters now gets 60% of the seats. Nobody changed parties. Nobody moved. Nobody added a vote or took one away. The grouping changed. This is the mechanism behind gerrymandering: drawing electoral districts to give a side an advantage in how votes become seats. The two moves to watch are packing and cracking. PACKING means concentrating your opponents into a small number of districts they win overwhelmingly. Winning one district by a giant margin still gives you one seat. Those extra votes do not spill into the district next door. CRACKING means spreading your opponents across enough districts that they keep falling short. They can be a substantial group overall and still lose each of those separate contests. Look closely at the three red-winning districts in the animation. Two contain four blue precincts and six red precincts. The third contains two blue and eight red. Blue loses all three even though the same electorate has a blue majority overall. That is why the shape of the map matters. The election is being counted inside boundaries, and the boundaries decide which voters are counted together. There is a second trap here: the map where blue wins every seat is not automatically a fair map just because blue has more voters. A 60% vote share does not become proportional representation when it produces a 100% seat share. The comparison shows how much the grouping can change the outcome. The state labels make the different layouts easier to follow. California, New York and Texas are used as illustrative examples, not claims about their actual district maps, vote shares or numbers of seats. Real precincts contain mixed political preferences, and real districts involve many more people. These equal-size, single-party dots deliberately simplify that mess so you can isolate one variable: the lines. The name also has a very literal backstory. In Massachusetts in 1812, Governor Elbridge Gerry signed a redistricting law. A district was mocked as looking like a salamander. Gerry plus salamander gave us "gerrymander." The historical newspaper image shown here is an 1813 reprint of the cartoon. A weird-looking district alone does not tell you everything about a map. The useful questions are who is grouped together, who gets split apart, and how those choices translate support into seats. You can test the idea yourself: keep the same 30 blue dots and 20 red dots, make five groups of ten, and compare the winners. Changing the total is easy to notice. Changing the grouping is easier to miss. You can count every vote correctly and still change the outcome by changing the groups those votes are counted in. Watch the dots, then watch the boundaries. The votes stay put while the result flips. Which part surprised you more: 60% winning every seat, or 40% winning the majority? #Gerrymandering #Redistricting #MathExplained #Voting #GravityAssist

#garotadaroça #meninadaroca #vidanaroça #tiktokviral #tiktokcreator

#garotadaroça #meninadaroca #vidanaroça #tiktokviral #tiktokcreator

POV: You’re sweating in the heat… but this neck fan CHANGES THE GAME 🌬️ 3-speed, USB charging, and *so* lightweight. Grab before it’s gone! #DealsforYouDays #NeckFanHack #SummerEssential #TikTokMadeMeBuyIt #CoolingSolution

POV: You’re sweating in the heat… but this neck fan CHANGES THE GAME 🌬️ 3-speed, USB charging, and *so* lightweight. Grab before it’s gone! #DealsforYouDays #NeckFanHack #SummerEssential #TikTokMadeMeBuyIt #CoolingSolution

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy