I'm gonna use your arguement it's hella good, is that alright?
2026-10-30 05:18:17
10
BlitZ_345 :
at least the kid was respectable and listened. rare nowadays
2026-10-29 21:44:20
95
Low_Ad1072 :
The fallacious assumption is the notion that at some point there must have been nothing. Why does the existence of nothing whatsoever at some point in time and space feel like a necessary logical premise? Science doesn’t rest upon the assumption that complete nothingness ever existed. Hell, the creation story in the Bible doesn’t even claim that the natural world outside of god didn’t exist prior to creation.
Atheism doesn’t base its credibility on a finite universe. Atheism doesn’t base its credibility on the linearity of time. Believing god has no beginning, no end, and no cause is no more logically sound than believing the same thing about the physical world as we know it. We have no problem accepting the infinite nature of the universe in space, so why would it present the slightest incongruity to accept its infinity in time?
2026-10-29 20:10:20
16
mm_unboxed9 :
There are so many fallacies,semantic shifts and logical gaps here 😭 people fall for this
2026-10-30 03:48:09
6
kieran :
might be worst argument oat
2026-10-30 02:00:37
24
RandomVillager :
OK, so prove God is real? cause the 3 laws of logic Gid does not fit into them. so by all means, please prove God is real.
2026-10-29 20:42:32
5
user7705968060313 :
God being real is a childish sunshine and rainbows view of the world. Humans want a saviour from the cruel reality of death
2026-10-29 21:13:35
70
tito ugan :
in this case, dont u still have to prove gods existence or at least the god that your religion is believing?. because lets say for example an existence of a god has a probability of 100%, well which one is it? everybody has their own explanation. like if theres 3 people with different religion and they got the same reasoning same, same everything except the story, id say its hard to believe
2026-10-29 15:12:27
5
OG malefic :
That only works if the person claims there is no God. If Atheism means "not believing in god" and that position hypothetically would be false, that would not mean that theism itself is right in conclusion to that because not believing in God isn't the same as asserting that God doesn't exist.
2026-10-29 20:27:50
6
Elliana :
Whether man believes in the existence of God or not, it has no bearing on God. God does not need the help of any man to be God. God is eternal and existed before creation. Mortal humans with vulnerabilities and weaknesses, today you are alive tomorrow you are dead and gone as if you never lived. If we want to experience God, We need to be humble and follow God's principles. Paradoxically it is rather man that needs God and not the other way round. Without God we are nothing.
2026-10-29 13:56:14
6
Chamingo :
Wait so how do concrete things not being completed and incomplete at the same time make STE wrong? I’m just trying to keep up.
2026-10-30 06:25:01
0
harmoZim :
this was not a debate
you just cornered him
2026-10-30 06:42:03
0
mm_unboxed9 :
The TEA premise leaves out many models cosmologists have come up with. Such as cyclical universes, quantum fluctuations, hawking no boundry. It's also special pleading, it applies the rule that the universe must come from something but then there is an exception for God. This is just Kalam's argument dressed up nicely
2026-10-30 03:37:29
0
To see more videos from user @kingchambothesovereign, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.