I admire you, Fatima. But that's an affordable and good price. And it's called defense for a reason. We're not going to war, but we always need to be prepared for war. The future is uncertain, and so is technology.
2026-10-30 13:16:03
1
JV :
Better to have them and not need them than need them and not have them
2026-10-30 13:48:19
0
Tcas :
Do you think you can deploy simulators in a conflict?
2026-10-29 13:17:22
62
Ozzydanny :
Um why train in simulators for vehicles you’ve not purchased
2026-10-30 13:51:02
0
ރ :
Queen 👸 Fatima
2026-10-29 10:51:32
128
SALAH (JAMES) :
They are probably out of date already..
A relatively cheap drone can take out a tank anyway.
2026-10-29 15:29:09
50
Momitja✊🏽 :
They will be outdated in 10 years
2026-10-29 22:34:00
6
jetpowercleaning :
somebody was hustling the system
2026-10-30 12:36:10
0
hussein525365 :
No one uses these vehicles , $1.2 billion for that scrap.
2026-10-29 10:19:57
346
archie :
I'd rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it. politicians really need to start understanding the concept of deterrence theory.
2026-10-29 11:58:18
22
D Company :
Why u need tank on a water lock country 👀
2026-10-29 14:32:22
7
Jace :
Tanks are pretty much obsolete now
2026-10-29 11:23:19
105
AMN :
1.8B is a shi amount of money for that number of tanks tbh
2026-10-29 10:56:25
104
Joe :
The most shocking part of this is the senator posting it like she somehow won this debate?
2026-10-29 19:49:42
147
Emperor :
Not Australian but it's always better to have them and not need them.
2026-10-29 15:33:33
37
jack :
we are an island, tanks sinks
2026-10-29 11:47:08
10
HR :
Gng that is not an abrams 💔
2026-10-29 20:32:53
20
travis.Chaos :
To clarify: her overall main point was the military already had 65 and bought newer ones when they’re just for training instead of revamping old ones an did they get into a war then buy new ones
2026-10-29 11:24:05
40
To see more videos from user @senatorfatimapayman, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.