@tmyz.almsthlk: تم افتتاح تميز المستهلك فرع الغسانية مقابل مستشفى بن جلوي 💙#ترقبووو #الاحساء_الهفوف #بوخمسة #ادوات_منزلية #افتتاح

tmyz almsthlk
tmyz almsthlk
Open In TikTok:
Region: SA
Thursday 29 October 2026 12:41:35 GMT
16956
204
16
110

Music

Download

Comments

cloud1419
Cloud :
رحت ما شفت شي واو كل شيء عادي جدا
2026-10-29 13:23:07
1
kashi.438
كاشي/Kashi :
هل يبيعون فشار وسلاش؟
2026-10-29 15:18:07
0
aseel202023
Asil :
وش يفرق عن محلات بوًخمسه ترا نفسه بس هذا المحل قريب من الغسانيه واسكان الحرس الوطني فقط لانه ماعندهم محلات بو خمسه قريبه عندهم
2026-10-31 11:31:18
0
user3369983461195
بترفلاي :
ترا بو خمسه وش تبون مميز فيه وان كان ع الاسم تراه اسم عادي يعني المهم قريب من الغسانيه عجزنا نروح لين هناك الاماكن الثانيه
2026-10-30 15:48:17
1
moo.1303
Moo.13 :
عادي والله والأشياء اللي قالوا عنها مش موجوده الاربعاء فاتحين والخميس مافيه جدا عادي
2026-10-29 14:27:04
0
ha369h
ha369h :
اتمنى يكون نظيف من الغبار مو مثل باقي المحلات الواحد يدخل ما فيه شي يطلع يعاطس والجيوب الأنفية تلتهب
2026-10-30 12:21:53
1
robi200000
R :
كم الساعه يفتح
2026-10-29 21:51:52
0
asola0000
عسوله 🍯🐝 :
اي عادي انا حبيت تميز المستهلك زي المستهلك جنب العثيم المهم عاجبني 👍👍وقريب للي من باقي المحلات .والحين الشوارع زحمه .. الله يعطيهم العافيه اللي فتح لنا الحين
2026-10-29 15:11:58
0
user2944096113448
𓆩 𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 🖤 𓆪 :
كل شي جميل وفخم والخامه تبع الاغراض مره حلوه والله من غير اي مجامله
2026-10-30 02:30:27
0
layla_loves_baking
layla_bakes :
ايش هي ساعات العمل إذا ممكن؟ عشان اجي بوقت ما فيه زحمه
2026-10-29 13:05:09
0
soso35621
🇹🇷Ș✨✨🖤 :
يستاهل العنوه؟!
2026-10-29 14:32:53
0
To see more videos from user @tmyz.almsthlk, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

We were promised an apocalyptic collapse of the government if we trimmed the bureaucracy, but it turns out the only thing that collapsed was the progressive myth of the essential administrative state. Let us look at the actual math instead of the partisan panic. When the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, was rolled out, critics warned of an unmitigated disaster that would grind the country to a halt. Yet, as City Journal data reveals, the federal workforce shrank by 270,000 people—a 12 percent drop and the fastest decline since World War II—with zero interruption to Social Security checks, IRS collections, or VA services. The mechanics of this progressive panic failed because the cuts did not target essential front-line workers. Instead, they trimmed the fat: middle managers, program analysts, and redundant administrators across all agencies, including the Department of Defense. Furthermore, federal contracting and grants decreased as well, debunking the baseline assumption that these jobs were simply outsourced to private cronies. But the true revelation here is a moral one. For decades, the progressive establishment has equated a bloated administrative state with compassion, gaslighting everyday taxpayers into believing that an ever-expanding bureaucracy is necessary to protect the vulnerable. In reality, forcing the working class to subsidize hundreds of thousands of redundant federal middle managers is not compassion; it is a betrayal of our social contract. True intergenerational stewardship requires respecting the public purse and acknowledging that the highest form of government responsibility is efficiency, not endless employment for the credentialed class. When we conflate administrative bloat with public service, we abandon the hard-working taxpayers who are forced to fund a system that serves its own expansion rather than the nation's actual needs. This is where the math and the morals collide. By proving that the government can function perfectly well with a significantly leaner workforce, this data exposes a fundamental hypocrisy in the progressive worldview: the belief that more government automatically equals better governance. When you apply logical discipline to the federal budget and prioritize merit over institutional status games, you do not destroy the safety net. You actually protect it by ensuring that resources are directed toward essential services rather than a self-perpetuating administrative elite. If the federal government can lose over a quarter of a million administrators without anyone noticing a drop in essential services, why were working-class taxpayers forced to foot their salaries to begin with? Credit: Judge Glock / City Journal #GovernmentEfficiency #FederalBudget #WorkingClass #PolicyDebate #RuleOfLaw
We were promised an apocalyptic collapse of the government if we trimmed the bureaucracy, but it turns out the only thing that collapsed was the progressive myth of the essential administrative state. Let us look at the actual math instead of the partisan panic. When the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, was rolled out, critics warned of an unmitigated disaster that would grind the country to a halt. Yet, as City Journal data reveals, the federal workforce shrank by 270,000 people—a 12 percent drop and the fastest decline since World War II—with zero interruption to Social Security checks, IRS collections, or VA services. The mechanics of this progressive panic failed because the cuts did not target essential front-line workers. Instead, they trimmed the fat: middle managers, program analysts, and redundant administrators across all agencies, including the Department of Defense. Furthermore, federal contracting and grants decreased as well, debunking the baseline assumption that these jobs were simply outsourced to private cronies. But the true revelation here is a moral one. For decades, the progressive establishment has equated a bloated administrative state with compassion, gaslighting everyday taxpayers into believing that an ever-expanding bureaucracy is necessary to protect the vulnerable. In reality, forcing the working class to subsidize hundreds of thousands of redundant federal middle managers is not compassion; it is a betrayal of our social contract. True intergenerational stewardship requires respecting the public purse and acknowledging that the highest form of government responsibility is efficiency, not endless employment for the credentialed class. When we conflate administrative bloat with public service, we abandon the hard-working taxpayers who are forced to fund a system that serves its own expansion rather than the nation's actual needs. This is where the math and the morals collide. By proving that the government can function perfectly well with a significantly leaner workforce, this data exposes a fundamental hypocrisy in the progressive worldview: the belief that more government automatically equals better governance. When you apply logical discipline to the federal budget and prioritize merit over institutional status games, you do not destroy the safety net. You actually protect it by ensuring that resources are directed toward essential services rather than a self-perpetuating administrative elite. If the federal government can lose over a quarter of a million administrators without anyone noticing a drop in essential services, why were working-class taxpayers forced to foot their salaries to begin with? Credit: Judge Glock / City Journal #GovernmentEfficiency #FederalBudget #WorkingClass #PolicyDebate #RuleOfLaw

About