@yk.natxq: Eat ur carbs & lift weights🤞

Nat🤍
Nat🤍
Open In TikTok:
Region: GB
Thursday 29 October 2026 22:26:09 GMT
1684
199
8
10

Music

Download

Comments

tacobella.superpriv
bella 🧘🏻‍♀️ :
the queen
2026-10-29 23:25:14
1
notbyami
ami ♡˘̈ :
Thats acc insane
2026-10-29 22:36:54
1
untalivangonzalez2
Ivan :
2026-10-29 22:44:37
0
neuacc_0
Leon_muc :
Mommy
2026-10-29 22:30:59
0
sweatwithsash_
sweatwithsash_ :
🔥🔥🔥
2026-10-29 22:27:58
0
r.p0rter
￴ ￴ ￴RPorters ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ :
💪💪💪
2026-10-30 07:50:09
0
To see more videos from user @yk.natxq, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

On Friday 23 October, Brazilian headlines said Meta charged President Lula's campaign up to 43% more than Flávio Bolsonaro's to reach 1,000 people with ads on Facebook and Instagram. The study behind that number, IPIE Technical Paper TP2026.3 with NetLab at UFRJ, says the public data can't establish it. Its authors estimated prices for first-round ads in four versions of the comparison: 10, 33, 39 and 43% more for Lula's campaign. The 10% comes from the version the study says to use when asking whether Meta treated the campaigns differently. It was within the margin of error. An outside reviewer, Fabio Votta, allowed for ads run from the same Facebook page. After that, none of the four estimates showed a clear difference. That isn't the same as equal prices. Meta says it doesn't set ad prices by an advertiser's identity or political position, and that comparing the spending ranges it publishes can mislead. Meta reports each ad's spending only as a range. For 3,939 of the 7,625 eligible ads, it's R$0 to R$99. It doesn't publish what each campaign asked the ads to do, or how it bid. So the question stays open. The missing numbers sit with Meta and the campaigns, and the study says a test of the auction would need both to take part. On Sunday 25 October Lula won the runoff with 51.79% of valid votes. In his victory speech he said the election had to defeat
On Friday 23 October, Brazilian headlines said Meta charged President Lula's campaign up to 43% more than Flávio Bolsonaro's to reach 1,000 people with ads on Facebook and Instagram. The study behind that number, IPIE Technical Paper TP2026.3 with NetLab at UFRJ, says the public data can't establish it. Its authors estimated prices for first-round ads in four versions of the comparison: 10, 33, 39 and 43% more for Lula's campaign. The 10% comes from the version the study says to use when asking whether Meta treated the campaigns differently. It was within the margin of error. An outside reviewer, Fabio Votta, allowed for ads run from the same Facebook page. After that, none of the four estimates showed a clear difference. That isn't the same as equal prices. Meta says it doesn't set ad prices by an advertiser's identity or political position, and that comparing the spending ranges it publishes can mislead. Meta reports each ad's spending only as a range. For 3,939 of the 7,625 eligible ads, it's R$0 to R$99. It doesn't publish what each campaign asked the ads to do, or how it bid. So the question stays open. The missing numbers sit with Meta and the campaigns, and the study says a test of the auction would need both to take part. On Sunday 25 October Lula won the runoff with 51.79% of valid votes. In his victory speech he said the election had to defeat "interference coming from outside, through digital platforms". He named no company. Sources: IPIE TP2026.3, Ads Without Accountability (with NetLab/UFRJ, 23 Oct); Meta's statement to SBT News (23 Oct) and its newsroom post (16 Oct); TSE (15, 20 and 25 Oct); Estado de Minas (23 Oct). Checked 27 Oct 2026, 16:50 CET. Narration: synthetic voice. Lula footage: Reuters; translation: Pollar. Cover photo (2019): Fachada do Congresso Nacional, Senado Federal, CC BY 2.0. #Brazil #Meta #Elections #Lula #Advertising

About