@capital.academy_: L’oréal Mass Tort Carve Out #foryoupage #finance #investmentbanking #restructuring

Captain Tuna :

Thought my fyp betrayed me for a second

alyalyaly :

how the fuck is this legal

The crumb guy :

I don’t understand anything you just said. However, all im hearing is to short their stock

Flo :

And hair relaxers and nearly exclusively used by black women. It’s so dark

✝️ bones :

Literally every loreal product I tried was garbage. I only use black owned brands now.

Trey :

My show is on

theregoesmaia :

so my crazy mom i havent spoken to in 10 years that told me at 12 I was never allowed to go lighter on my hair actually did a good thing for once ✨😭😅

astra :

yeah yeah get closer to the mic

Molly Savage :

this turned me on

Đarling In The Gheţţo :

So they basically sold/offloaded products to a company to reduce liability risks?

Cesarsaladfriesandbeer :

3M and DuPont chemical manufacturing did something similar in regards to PFAS!

Zoë-Jordan :

Johnson & Johnson type beat

The Enlighten Knight :

just showing large companies know exactly how to shield themselves to prevent liability. Butv would vicarious liability apply to parent company? There would be no reasonable or prudent precedence that would show that could be done in good faith imo.

Just Phil TV :

As someone who has actually transported product to their factories……. Yes, they did that shii

Trooper :

OHHH YEEESSSS

STRKLR :

So calls on L’Oréal. Got it

Sidearc :

In the back of my mind, I just felt like there was something wrong with this company, but I couldn’t put my finger on it. There was just something so nestle about it

lotsofaffirmation :

Think you need a better mic fam

kingororo :

How did I end up here

bb :

Lemonmack :

Finally. I can sleep again.

EthanSargent415 :

I don’t think a carve-out is inherently problematic, but I would question whether it actually caps L’Oréal’s exposure. The key issue for me is whether the transferred entity has sufficient funding and insurance to meet existing and future claims, and whether claimants retain enforceable rights against the responsible companies. Continuing the business under a new brand would not, by itself, erase responsibility for earlier products. I’d also distinguish transferring the financial burden of litigation from obtaining a legal release. Even if management relied on outside consultants, that would not automatically defeat product-liability claims. I’d want to understand the funding and release mechanisms before concluding that the transaction resolves the long-term risk.

Noble9HR :

so what stocks do we buy?

giuseppefrisoni40 :

......

ogwalayaya :

Eish 😳