@greens9.official: V

Greens9.official
Greens9.official
Open In TikTok:
Region: GB
Friday 30 October 2026 17:27:06 GMT
0
0
0
0

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @greens9.official, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

In February 2024, federal Judge Cormac Carney dismissed the case against Robert Rundo and Robert Boman, members of the Rise Above Movement. The judge acknowledged that members of the group likely engaged in criminal violence, but argued that the government could not prosecute them because of their offensive political speech while allegedly overlooking similar violence by others. Let that sink in. The judge placed the First Amendment, freedom of speech, and the right to assemble at the center of his decision—even while acknowledging allegations of criminal violence. Now look at Edin Alex Enamorado. Edin used his voice to organize, speak up for street vendors, defend his community, and challenge those in power. His supporters maintain that he never called for violence, never encouraged attacks, and never used his platform to recruit people for violent acts. Yet Edin has remained behind bars without bail since December 14, 2023, facing serious charges that he continues to fight. And yes, the Ninth Circuit later reversed the dismissal in the Rundo case, reinstating the indictment. Rundo eventually pleaded guilty, and Boman was convicted. But Robert Rundo pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 24 months in federal prison in December 2024, with credit for time served. • Robert Boman was convicted by a federal jury in March 2025. But the question remains: Why is freedom of speech and assembly emphasized when a white supremacist group is before the court, while a community organizer who says he was exercising his voice to defend his people remains incarcerated? Is the First Amendment supposed to protect speech we agree with—or speech we find offensive, uncomfortable, and challenging? Does the right to speak freely belong to everyone, including organizers who challenge police power and defend marginalized communities? WHO GETS TO EXERCISE THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS—AND WHO PAYS THE PRICE FOR USING THEIR VOICE? I’m asking people to read the record, look at the timelines, and ask questions. These are different cases and different courts, but the questions about free expression, equal treatment, and due process deserve public scrutiny. Comment your thoughts. Share this. Let’s have the conversation. #freeedinalexenamorado #alexenamorado
In February 2024, federal Judge Cormac Carney dismissed the case against Robert Rundo and Robert Boman, members of the Rise Above Movement. The judge acknowledged that members of the group likely engaged in criminal violence, but argued that the government could not prosecute them because of their offensive political speech while allegedly overlooking similar violence by others. Let that sink in. The judge placed the First Amendment, freedom of speech, and the right to assemble at the center of his decision—even while acknowledging allegations of criminal violence. Now look at Edin Alex Enamorado. Edin used his voice to organize, speak up for street vendors, defend his community, and challenge those in power. His supporters maintain that he never called for violence, never encouraged attacks, and never used his platform to recruit people for violent acts. Yet Edin has remained behind bars without bail since December 14, 2023, facing serious charges that he continues to fight. And yes, the Ninth Circuit later reversed the dismissal in the Rundo case, reinstating the indictment. Rundo eventually pleaded guilty, and Boman was convicted. But Robert Rundo pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 24 months in federal prison in December 2024, with credit for time served. • Robert Boman was convicted by a federal jury in March 2025. But the question remains: Why is freedom of speech and assembly emphasized when a white supremacist group is before the court, while a community organizer who says he was exercising his voice to defend his people remains incarcerated? Is the First Amendment supposed to protect speech we agree with—or speech we find offensive, uncomfortable, and challenging? Does the right to speak freely belong to everyone, including organizers who challenge police power and defend marginalized communities? WHO GETS TO EXERCISE THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS—AND WHO PAYS THE PRICE FOR USING THEIR VOICE? I’m asking people to read the record, look at the timelines, and ask questions. These are different cases and different courts, but the questions about free expression, equal treatment, and due process deserve public scrutiny. Comment your thoughts. Share this. Let’s have the conversation. #freeedinalexenamorado #alexenamorado

About