@zorelislares04: #fy #parati #viral #telefono

🎀la niña zore2🎀
🎀la niña zore2🎀
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Friday 30 October 2026 20:41:27 GMT
3463
446
3
1

Music

Download

Comments

lanena23_6
🎀𝙽𝚎𝚗𝚊𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟿亗 :
3 clasro que yes malditas🥰😁😂😂
2026-10-30 20:46:07
0
fiorella.perea
🩷🩵fiorepc🩷🩵 :
me encanto
2026-10-30 20:44:48
0
aranza.snchez03
Ara❤️‍🩹 :
primeraaa
2026-10-30 20:44:05
0
To see more videos from user @zorelislares04, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

🚨⚖️ BREAKING: COMMONWEALTH TRIES TO SHUT DOWN HOLDOUT JUROR ARGUMENT — JUDGE SAYS NO! Before arguments could even begin at Lindsay Clancy’s November 2 hearing, the prosecution raised an objection! The Commonwealth argued that the defense’s challenge involving the lone holdout juror lacked sufficient evidentiary support and should not be considered. BUT JUDGE WILLIAM SULLIVAN DENIED THE REQUEST! The defense was permitted to proceed with its argument. And this matters because Lindsay’s legal team is challenging whether the September mistrial was constitutionally justified. Remember: ⚖️ Eleven jurors reportedly favored finding Lindsay not guilty by reason of insanity. ⚖️ One juror held out. ⚖️ The defense argues the court failed to conduct a constitutionally sufficient inquiry into concerns that the holdout juror wasn’t following the law. ⚖️ The prosecution maintains the mistrial was properly declared and that further questioning could have improperly pressured the juror. Now Lindsay’s defense is arguing that another trial could violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. TO BE CLEAR: The judge allowing the argument does not mean he’s agreed with the defense or dismissed the charges. But the prosecution’s attempt to stop this portion of the argument did not succeed. 💬 WHAT DO YOU THINK? Should the judge have investigated the lone holdout juror more deeply before declaring a mistrial? #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BreakingNews #DoubleJeopardy #CourtroomDrama
🚨⚖️ BREAKING: COMMONWEALTH TRIES TO SHUT DOWN HOLDOUT JUROR ARGUMENT — JUDGE SAYS NO! Before arguments could even begin at Lindsay Clancy’s November 2 hearing, the prosecution raised an objection! The Commonwealth argued that the defense’s challenge involving the lone holdout juror lacked sufficient evidentiary support and should not be considered. BUT JUDGE WILLIAM SULLIVAN DENIED THE REQUEST! The defense was permitted to proceed with its argument. And this matters because Lindsay’s legal team is challenging whether the September mistrial was constitutionally justified. Remember: ⚖️ Eleven jurors reportedly favored finding Lindsay not guilty by reason of insanity. ⚖️ One juror held out. ⚖️ The defense argues the court failed to conduct a constitutionally sufficient inquiry into concerns that the holdout juror wasn’t following the law. ⚖️ The prosecution maintains the mistrial was properly declared and that further questioning could have improperly pressured the juror. Now Lindsay’s defense is arguing that another trial could violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. TO BE CLEAR: The judge allowing the argument does not mean he’s agreed with the defense or dismissed the charges. But the prosecution’s attempt to stop this portion of the argument did not succeed. 💬 WHAT DO YOU THINK? Should the judge have investigated the lone holdout juror more deeply before declaring a mistrial? #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BreakingNews #DoubleJeopardy #CourtroomDrama

About