MaliciousMeerkat
Region: NL
Saturday 31 October 2026 17:18:15 GMT
412175
14499
571
227
Music
Download
Comments
Daniel Morris :
Emma she is the one who’s pointing hands first
2026-10-31 17:22:12
2193
Sully 🍁🍂 :
Emma... how did she know it was a him?
2026-10-31 17:37:59
106
Mahi :
Answer is Emma: If Emma is telling the truth (Jake killed him), then Noah would also have to be telling the truth (Emma didn’t kill him) which doesn’t work because only one of them can be telling the truth. This means that Emma is lying, and Jake didn’t kill the owner. If Jake is telling the truth, then both Emma and Noah can be lying, which meets the “one person telling the truth” requirement. This would mean that Jake didn’t kill him (because Jake is telling the truth and Emma is lying), but since Noah would be lying, Emma would be the killer. If Noah is telling the truth (“Emma didn’t kill him,”) then Emma would have to be lying (meaning Jake didn’t kill him) and so would Jake (meaning Jake did kill him). Those would be contradictory truths, meaning Noah was lying and could not have been telling the truth. That means Jake was the one telling the truth, and Emma was the killer.
2026-10-31 19:29:17
724
isaac_isamazing :
Noah and Emma were working together
2026-10-31 17:46:10
918
•𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐡• :
"creepy fact" and then asks a question
2026-10-31 21:04:38
141
ethanfc🥊🥶 :
It was Noah because how would he know Emma dissent kill her
2026-10-31 17:26:57
193
nevaeh.1224 :
NOAH! here’s my reasoning Jake said I didn’t kill him Emma said Jake killed him, but Noah said Emma didn’t kill him so how did he know Emma didn’t kill him unless he killed him
2026-10-31 17:32:12
18
🐑𝓩𝔃𝔃…🦇 :
Emma, because if Jake’s telling the truth (which means that he didn’t do it) means that Noah’s lying and Emma too, and if Noah was telling the truth nor Emma or Jake could’ve been, and if Emma’s telling the truth means that nor Noah or Jake could’ve been
2026-10-31 18:11:49
89
itsheath204 :
Emma because if Jake did kill him than Noah would also be telling the truth but that would be two truths instead of two lies
2026-10-31 22:04:25
4
Bilal yousef :
It was me
2026-10-31 17:20:55
33
jay :
nah, cause how does he know Emma didn't do it
2026-10-31 19:51:22
32
🕊️🪽luciaa🪽🕊️ :
Noah bc no one said he didnt do it
2026-10-31 17:31:46
39
Ella :
Emma bc why would Noah say she didn’t if he wasn’t covering for her hm?
2026-10-31 18:50:40
15
akuby877 :
if we reverse all 3 statements and say 2 are true, we get. Emma: Jake didnt kill him. Jake: i killed him. Noah: Emma killed him. Emma's and Jake's statement are contradictory meaning so either could be the truth, leaving Noah's reverse statemetnas being the truth therefore Emma's reverse statement was the other truth. this means Jake was the only honest one and the other two were lying, therefore Noah's statement was a lie so the reverse would mean Emma was the murderer
2026-11-01 03:58:13
0
bella :
Noah and emma
2026-10-31 17:21:35
5
♥️ :
Noah so he can have someone to team up w him on Jake and he’ll be free
2026-10-31 17:22:16
7
Josh:) :
emma and noah
2026-10-31 17:50:47
5
the1anonlygoat :
Emma and noah
2026-11-01 04:18:04
0
Cameron💕🥷💯 :
All of them because how did they know its a him
2026-10-31 22:27:01
1
Ayden Layne :
Any one of them could’ve done it, the only way you can tell who actually did it is by knowing the answer before hand. If you go thru every single combination you get a different killer everytime
2026-10-31 22:18:11
0
sofi :
it was emma.. I think it's because she was the only one who said "killed" not kill like the others
2026-10-31 20:08:52
0
CoasterThoosie :
How does Emma know the owners gender?
2026-10-31 19:23:15
0
𝓃𝒽𝓂ℴ𝓂𝓎 𝒶ꨄ :
its jake
2026-10-31 21:29:39
0
L ✨ :
Emma, because if she’s truthful, then Noah is lying
2026-10-31 22:37:04
2
To see more videos from user @maliciousmeerkat, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
