@jackrein316: Please watch my longer videos if you’re interested in deeper descriptions, but I wanted to make a really clearer video about what a yes and no vote does for nine valid questions and under three minutes. #learnontiktok

ash :

NO ON 8!!! I WANT TO KEEP MY JOB

Sam :

lol so thats why i keep seeing no on 9 signs all over my redneck town🙄

Loren :

I'll skip over all that 🤦‍♀️they don't care ,it never matters 🙄🙄 just casting votes on people 💯

RedB :

Thank you for this video because I live in Massachusetts and it feels like a test 😂😭 and they’re very sneaky this time around

pierogi bro :

NO on 3, 5 & 8 !!!!

Danny🥶 :

No on 8&9!!!

crc_22_ :

CutlassChic :

victorcappadona1 :

no on 9 read all 37 pages

Madewell :

no one 3, 5, and 8

certified tweaker :

NO ON EIGHT PLEASE.

abi :

No on 8!

mrothen25 :

Can someone propose a law that makes these votes straight forward, so those who aren’t as invested at least have a basic understanding of what they are voting yes/no on?

J🫧 :

and why were there SO MANY😭

ReadingPanda :

NO ON 3,5,8!!!

BassRiverBill :

Of all the questions the most important ones are, vote no on eight, and vote yes on nine.

moto.nomad.69 :

No on 9

Sammy :

YES on 1 and 5 NO on everything else

Kl_rk :

7 is a no. their min size is too small and just leads to those towns of copy/paste homes built with no yards. they need to take another stab at it with a more reasonable size

VulcanQueen77 :

8 and 9 especially. bring the book in with you.

sue_monster :

Question 7 is a no for me. IMO, The MBTA housing law only benefited developers and made housing more expensive. This law is for square footage allowed to build and does not dictate the price of “starter homes”.. the issue at hand is we need AFFORDABILITY in Massachusetts housing, not more units. I’m not economist so I don’t know how to make this work, but passing another law state wide is too overreaching for me.

Jacob M :

U didnt go indepth enough i feel

Kitt :

7 is technically about housing but they’re trying to hide the fact that it would undercut the law that allows cities/towns to decide on lot sizes and would allow the state to decide for everyone. I agree we have a housing crisis in cities, and this needs to be addressed by the city/town but not by the state. Mass has so many diverse towns it wouldn’t make sense to make an umbrella decision for everyone!!

Gela :

No on 2

fizzlenuggets :

Basically yes on all except 5. Tax the millionaires!