@flinty888: ابو احمد #fyp #foryou #the_flint #flinty888 #explore

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐅𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐓 🔐 🏒
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐅𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐓 🔐 🏒
Open In TikTok:
Region: JO
Sunday 01 November 2026 16:59:08 GMT
241
11
0
2

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @flinty888, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

A federal judge on Thursday directed the Trump administration to retain all relevant records after the Justice Department acknowledged it made a “factual error” in litigation over whether migrants can be arrested when they show up for immigration court hearings. Lawyers for the DOJ told U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel that they had relied on an incorrect interpretation provided by an attorney for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement regarding a policy memo the agency had cited as justification for courthouse arrests. According to prosecutors, the May 2025 ICE memo in question “does not and has never applied” to civil immigration enforcement actions conducted in or around courts run by the Executive Office for Immigration Review, which oversees immigration proceedings. The admission could have significant consequences for the case. Judge Castel had previously refused to halt courthouse arrests, in part because of the government’s reliance on that memo. Court filings also revealed that ICE officials circulated an internal email on March 19 clarifying that the memo does not authorize arrests at immigration courts, though it does permit enforcement actions at other types of courthouses. While DOJ attorneys apologized for the mistake, they maintained that their broader legal arguments remain valid. Advocates representing migrants strongly disagreed, arguing the memo was central to the government’s defense and that the correction could reshape the case. Amy Belsher of the New York Civil Liberties Union said the government’s reversal undercuts its justification for a policy that has led to widespread courthouse arrests. She argued that, for more than a year, ICE had pointed to the memo as authorization for the practice, and that its acknowledgment now shows those claims were unfounded. The development, she said, highlights what advocates view as a lack of regard for immigrants who attend required court hearings. The controversy stems from enforcement tactics used over the summer, when ICE prosecutors would sometimes move to dismiss cases in court, only for officers waiting outside to detain individuals as they exited, often under the impression their cases were no longer being pursued. Attorneys for migrants say the approach has affected large numbers of people nationwide, turning routine court appearances into opportunities for arrest and removal. They argue the practice undermines both fairness and the integrity of the immigration court system by effectively transforming required hearings into enforcement traps.#fyp #viral
A federal judge on Thursday directed the Trump administration to retain all relevant records after the Justice Department acknowledged it made a “factual error” in litigation over whether migrants can be arrested when they show up for immigration court hearings. Lawyers for the DOJ told U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel that they had relied on an incorrect interpretation provided by an attorney for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement regarding a policy memo the agency had cited as justification for courthouse arrests. According to prosecutors, the May 2025 ICE memo in question “does not and has never applied” to civil immigration enforcement actions conducted in or around courts run by the Executive Office for Immigration Review, which oversees immigration proceedings. The admission could have significant consequences for the case. Judge Castel had previously refused to halt courthouse arrests, in part because of the government’s reliance on that memo. Court filings also revealed that ICE officials circulated an internal email on March 19 clarifying that the memo does not authorize arrests at immigration courts, though it does permit enforcement actions at other types of courthouses. While DOJ attorneys apologized for the mistake, they maintained that their broader legal arguments remain valid. Advocates representing migrants strongly disagreed, arguing the memo was central to the government’s defense and that the correction could reshape the case. Amy Belsher of the New York Civil Liberties Union said the government’s reversal undercuts its justification for a policy that has led to widespread courthouse arrests. She argued that, for more than a year, ICE had pointed to the memo as authorization for the practice, and that its acknowledgment now shows those claims were unfounded. The development, she said, highlights what advocates view as a lack of regard for immigrants who attend required court hearings. The controversy stems from enforcement tactics used over the summer, when ICE prosecutors would sometimes move to dismiss cases in court, only for officers waiting outside to detain individuals as they exited, often under the impression their cases were no longer being pursued. Attorneys for migrants say the approach has affected large numbers of people nationwide, turning routine court appearances into opportunities for arrest and removal. They argue the practice undermines both fairness and the integrity of the immigration court system by effectively transforming required hearings into enforcement traps.#fyp #viral

About