@footballcrosscheck: Liverpool vs Arsenal: Gakpo Penalty Appeal Denied 😡 [Liverpool vs Arsenal produced a major penalty debate at Anfield on 1 November 2026, when Cody Gakpo went down inside the Arsenal penalty area after contact with Christos Tzolis in the 29th minute. Liverpool wanted a spot-kick, but referee Andy Madley allowed play to continue and VAR checked the incident without overturning the decision. My view is that Tzolis held Gakpo and restricted his movement as he chased the loose ball. Under IFAB Law 12, holding an opponent is a direct-free-kick offence when the contact impedes movement. When that offence happens inside the defender’s penalty area, it can mean a penalty. The key point is whether Tzolis’s grip actually stopped Gakpo’s run, especially with another defender already in front of the ball. Former Premier League referee Mark Halsey later said the Tzolis contact was not enough for a penalty, while judging the earlier Jurrien Timber shirt pull on Alexander Isak as a clear penalty. Those are two separate incidents and should not be confused. This video explains why I believe Liverpool should have received a penalty for the Gakpo incident, what the rule says, and why the VAR decision remains debatable. Arsenal eventually won 1-0 through Kai Havertz’s 16th-minute goal.] Cody Gakpo, Christos Tzolis, Liverpool FC, Arsenal FC, Liverpool vs Arsenal, Liverpool Arsenal 2026, Premier League 2026 27, Premier League Matchday 9, Gakpo penalty appeal, Tzolis holding Gakpo, Liverpool denied penalty, Liverpool penalty controversy, Andy Madley referee, VAR penalty decision, Law 12 holding offence, football refereeing, Andoni Iraola, Alexander Isak penalty appeal, Jurrien Timber shirt pull, Arsenal 1-0 Liverpool #CodyGakpo #LiverpoolFC #ArsenalFC #PremierLeague Was Tzolis's Contact Enough to Deny Gakpo a Penalty? Gakpo's Penalty Appeal and the Law Behind It Why Liverpool Were Left Furious With VAR Andoni Iraola Shows Officials the Gakpo Holding Incident Mark Halsey's Verdict on the Tzolis-Gakpo Contact Did Tzolis Stop Gakpo From Reaching the Ball? Liverpool's Two Penalty Claims Against Arsenal Explained The Moment Gakpo Went Down Inside Arsenal's Box Should Andy Madley Have Pointed to the Spot? What VAR Checked in Liverpool's Gakpo Penalty Appeal#creatorsearchinsights

Football Crosscheck
Football Crosscheck
Open In TikTok:
Region: NG
Sunday 01 November 2026 20:34:49 GMT
13988
268
12
57

Music

Download

Comments

akamumpa.frank
uncleP256 :
first check where the ball was
2026-11-02 06:22:40
1
bb_1z4
posting with Clifford 123 :
That's a penalty refree
2026-11-02 03:56:16
1
proftugah2
ProfTugah :
The standard of officiating and VAR when it comes to Arsenal this season has been shocking. It feels like every 50/50 goes their way. They get away with constant physical fouls and bullying, while the opposition gets booked for the same challenges. Last season they were allowed to get away with blocking goalkeepers at set-pieces. This season it's even more obvious - referees are protecting them. Against Chelsea, Konsa, Lewis-Skelly and Declan Rice all should have seen red. Against Liverpool, Timber clearly pulled Isak's shirt inside the penalty box to stop a header and VAR didn't even look at it, and Madueke got away without a card for heading Mac Allister. No penalty, no cards - VAR is just favouring them.
2026-11-01 22:07:05
1
binjamah29
Pigeonhole :
Give it out bro
2026-11-02 02:21:41
0
soripalissorisita
Soripalis Sorisita :
Thank you Refree 😝
2026-11-01 22:12:29
1
mwangi.ptr
Mwangi :
🟥
2026-11-02 05:20:22
1
joyce.nantono5
Joyce Nantono :
gakpo dives
2026-11-02 00:29:56
1
footballcrosscheck
Football Crosscheck :
What do you think 🤔
2026-11-01 21:34:48
0
To see more videos from user @footballcrosscheck, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About