@charliejhills: A hidden model just beat Claude's best. Everyone thinks it's Fable 5.5. Here's what we know: It's called Obsidian 3. Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0 data had it. It scored 46.8%. Opus 5.5 scored 45.5%. It ran in Claude Code, like every Claude model. But I looked at the chart. Every Claude model on it is orange. Obsidian 3 is blue, the same blue as Meta's model. You'd pay about 3.6x Opus at the same effort. At max effort, both scored 45.5%. A day later, someone pulled the row. Anthropic hasn't announced Fable 5.5. So I'm staying on Opus 5.5 for now. You can use it today, and it's basically level. Would you pay nearly 4x for the same score?
its 45.5 only on max, idk but smaller effort equals better performance on obsidian like on high its better than opus, on xhigh is a lil better than opus but on max its same as opus
2026-11-03 08:24:59
0
Michael Bridges :
Growth speaks
2026-11-03 16:08:45
1
Peter Millington :
what an utterly pointless video
2026-11-02 21:58:55
1
To see more videos from user @charliejhills, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.