@imtheofficialkon: Walking straight into his own trap. 😂

Michelle Strain :

The insanity of his hypocrisy!

Dragondeznuts :

well it did "technically" cover the ownership of cannons,but we can't own a cannon without a thousand permits!

Gen❌ Heather 🏴‍☠️ :

But but but but but

Mel Joy :

His argument “they weren’t invented yet”, plays into the Michigan candidate who said the 2A is only for muskets because that’s all they had. If his false logic were true than we’re all entitled to a canon also.

tony t :

arms were considered anything you could use to protect yourself and take into war if you had to protect your freedoms and the freedoms of others and shall not be infringed was meant to not impead the ability to own what you feel is needed

CvilleTNconservative3.0 :

He glitched

Laura Ubele Spoletin :

I say we go back to swords and other weaponry from mid evil times. 😆😆😆 j/k but would be soo cool to see sword fights.

LouietheTigerSS :

No, he proved to the world he is full of pride and ego unable to admit that he was wrong! unfortunately most people behave this way. Seek humility and truth, seek Christ Jesus!

Mr. Roboto :

lookinwest :

Get that guy another drink

kennypitts331 :

randomtruckguy1 :

the puckle gun is covered by this logic, and arguably way more dangerous thant ar15

Sagicorn1269❌ :

The original founders didn’t get paid to run the country, they all had separate paying jobs

jondow :

❌Berge❌ :

well done

America McCarthy :

lol

TikTokRedHead :

BOOM

Jay :

yes it does

Nokkturnal80❌ :

thomasjezick :

that's why it's worded, "the right to bear ARMS", because our forefathers new weapons would evolve, otherwise they would have said the right to bear muskets.....

TopFuel66 :

Brilliant

Roger Brown :

duh duh !! 🤣

brendajackson53 :

TikTok Ric :

.