@lilyg4168: ခက်ပီရှင့်..'🙄💞

🐢

Open In TikTok:

Region: MM

Thursday 05 November 2026 07:49:43 GMT

36865

5414

72

301

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Nyo Chaw''✔ :

မိန်းကလေဘက်ကhiရင်ဘာပြန်ပိုရမလည်မသိဘူဖစ်နေတာ😞😞

2026-11-06 13:29:36

2

🖤xxxTentacion🖤 :

ကျနော်လာပြောမယ်လေး အချစ်စကားလေးတွေပေါ့☺️😁

2026-11-06 04:37:12

6

2 Second :

love you cx tl byr🤪

2026-11-06 05:50:51

1

☄️𝒁𝑨𝑺𝑻メ҉ 𝑷𝑹𝑺𝑻 ☄️ :

လူတစ်ချို့က အချစ်ကိုကြောက်ကြပါတယ်

2026-11-06 14:31:02

0

မောင်လူအေး🧊 :

ဘာကြည့်တာလဲဟွန့်

2026-11-06 13:48:40

1

jerry😜🤪 :

ပုံမှန်ပ့ပဲဘားမှမဟုပ့ဝူးသူက😒🤔

2026-11-06 13:14:25

1

အညာသား™ :

ကျမရောပဲ

2026-11-06 13:24:46

1

°•°🌪 :

ဘယ်လို့ပြောရတာလဲသင်ပေးကြပါအုံး🙂‍↕️

2026-11-06 11:47:00

1

Z💫 :

ကျနော် လဲ အပျိုကြီးပဲလုပ်တော့မယ် 🗿

2026-11-06 01:40:52

2

„NGATUN„ :

တူတူဘဲဗျာ🥹

2026-11-06 13:00:51

1

💕T💐 :

ဝါးးး ဆယ်လီ💐

2026-11-06 05:35:16

1

⏤͟͟͞͞ᴍɢ⃝ ʜᴛᴇᴛ ᥫ᭡🫟🪪 :

အယ်လို့ပြော

2026-11-06 07:41:20

3

𝐏 :

လာပြောမှာနော်''အဲဆို😩

2026-11-06 12:39:11

1

MGRio :

မမကိုခ်စ္တယ္ဗ်ာ😝

2026-11-06 07:34:03

1

@Kenji's :

မပြောတတ်ပါဘူးဗျာ

2026-11-06 12:27:22

1

𝕾𝖍𝖆𝖉𝖔𝖜 𝕱𝖑𝖆𝖘𝖍 🐻 :

2026-11-06 06:59:22

1

Nga Phyo''' :

တူတူဘဲ

2026-11-06 04:41:29

1

ငွေ🦆😁😇 :

2026-11-06 04:55:53

1

💥Ryan💥 :

2026-11-06 07:49:21

1

မာလာရှမ်းကော့🤌🏿 :

ဘဝဂအဲလိုပါဆိုနေ😞🤌🏿

2026-11-06 08:03:38

1

🤓ချစ်တီး🤓 :

သင်ပေမယ်ဗျာ

2026-11-06 10:39:03

1

M҉g҉ :

ttဘဲ

2026-11-06 06:37:29

1

kyle🎱🦇 :

2026-11-06 00:07:55

1

blril :

ဟုတ်ပေျာ်တိုအဖြေမပေးဘူး🥺

2026-11-06 00:25:36

1

-Love- :

ရီးစားစကားမပြောတတ်ရင်ဒီsticker လေးပို့လိုက်😅

2026-11-06 09:33:21

1

To see more videos from user @lilyg4168, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Chal kismat tu bhi lagale Jor 💥💯 #mannish333 #patetakura

Chal kismat tu bhi lagale Jor 💥💯 #mannish333 #patetakura

𝐅𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐒𝐨𝐧𝐠 🎵🎧🫀| 𝐅𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐒𝐨𝐧𝐠🎧 Slowed & Reverb || Song : Khoborer Kagoj || Samz Vai #lofi_alauddin_vibes #lofi #song #slowed_reverb #bangla_song

𝐅𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐒𝐨𝐧𝐠 🎵🎧🫀| 𝐅𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐒𝐨𝐧𝐠🎧 Slowed & Reverb || Song : Khoborer Kagoj || Samz Vai #lofi_alauddin_vibes #lofi #song #slowed_reverb #bangla_song

ITS PERFFFFF no one will convince me the other one is worth double. #tiktokshopcreatorpicks #tiktokshoprestock #tiktokshopstockup #ittybittycommitee #tiktokshopfinds

ITS PERFFFFF no one will convince me the other one is worth double. #tiktokshopcreatorpicks #tiktokshoprestock #tiktokshopstockup #ittybittycommitee #tiktokshopfinds

#ကြိုက်ရင်မနက်ဖန်editတင်မယ်#alightmotion_edit #presetalightmotion🎟️ #viewတေဘယ်ပျောက်

#ကြိုက်ရင်မနက်ဖန်editတင်မယ်#alightmotion_edit #presetalightmotion🎟️ #viewတေဘယ်ပျောက်

US DOJ wants Mohamed's bail revoked — but does it have the legal authority? Guyana Rule Of Law vs United States The United States government wants Opposition Leader Azruddin Mohamed’s extradition bail revoked. But after two unsuccessful applications before Chief Magistrate Judy Latchman, a much bigger legal and constitutional question is emerging: Can the US government use its influence to challenge a decision made by Guyana’s courts — and what specific legal authority allows it to do so? At the centre of this developing legal battle is the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), which is pursuing the federal criminal case against Azruddin Mohamed and his father, Nazar Mohamed, in the Southern District of Florida. The legal representatives pursuing the bail-revocation applications in Guyana include Jamaican King's Counsel Terrence Williams and Guyanese attorney Glenn Hanoman. Williams made the November 2 application, which was rejected. Hanoman renewed the application on November 3, but the Chief Magistrate again refused to revoke Mohamed's extradition bail. The US legal team also includes lawyers reported to be involved in the wider extradition proceedings, including Herbert McKenzie and Celine Deidrick. Meanwhile, the wider American investigation has involved US federal law enforcement agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). But there is an important distinction between investigating a case, prosecuting a federal indictment and seeking to revoke someone's bail in another country's courts. The prosecution has raised serious allegations, including alleged witness interference and other criminal matters. However, allegations are not convictions, and the existence of pending charges does not automatically establish that an accused person has breached bail conditions or presents a flight risk. The central legal issue is whether the US prosecution has a valid procedural route to challenge the magistrate's refusal to revoke existing extradition bail. Guyana's Fugitive Offenders Act provides specific review mechanisms in certain extradition proceedings. But does the relevant provision extend to this particular bail decision? If the US prosecution intends to pursue judicial review, what is its legal basis, does it have standing, and what specific error is it asking the High Court to correct? This report examines the legal questions, the American officials and agencies involved in the wider case, the attorneys pursuing the applications in Guyana, and the implications for Guyana's judicial independence. THE QUESTIONS THAT MATTER: Who is directing the US legal effort to have Mohamed's extradition bail revoked? What legal authority allows the US prosecution to challenge the magistrate's decision? Can judicial review become another opportunity to argue the same bail application? Must a foreign government follow the same legal procedures as every other party before Guyana's courts? What does this dispute mean for Guyana's sovereignty and the independence of its judiciary? This is not about placing anyone above the law. It is about ensuring that the law applies equally, regardless of whether the party seeking a particular outcome is a local prosecutor or a powerful foreign government. Guyana's courts must answer to the law — not political pressure, diplomatic influence or the demands of any foreign power. Watch the full report and decide: Is this simply a legitimate legal challenge, or is Guyana facing a bigger test of its judicial independence? AI Generated #AzruddinMohamed #Guyana #USDOJ #FBI #DEA

US DOJ wants Mohamed's bail revoked — but does it have the legal authority? Guyana Rule Of Law vs United States The United States government wants Opposition Leader Azruddin Mohamed’s extradition bail revoked. But after two unsuccessful applications before Chief Magistrate Judy Latchman, a much bigger legal and constitutional question is emerging: Can the US government use its influence to challenge a decision made by Guyana’s courts — and what specific legal authority allows it to do so? At the centre of this developing legal battle is the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), which is pursuing the federal criminal case against Azruddin Mohamed and his father, Nazar Mohamed, in the Southern District of Florida. The legal representatives pursuing the bail-revocation applications in Guyana include Jamaican King's Counsel Terrence Williams and Guyanese attorney Glenn Hanoman. Williams made the November 2 application, which was rejected. Hanoman renewed the application on November 3, but the Chief Magistrate again refused to revoke Mohamed's extradition bail. The US legal team also includes lawyers reported to be involved in the wider extradition proceedings, including Herbert McKenzie and Celine Deidrick. Meanwhile, the wider American investigation has involved US federal law enforcement agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). But there is an important distinction between investigating a case, prosecuting a federal indictment and seeking to revoke someone's bail in another country's courts. The prosecution has raised serious allegations, including alleged witness interference and other criminal matters. However, allegations are not convictions, and the existence of pending charges does not automatically establish that an accused person has breached bail conditions or presents a flight risk. The central legal issue is whether the US prosecution has a valid procedural route to challenge the magistrate's refusal to revoke existing extradition bail. Guyana's Fugitive Offenders Act provides specific review mechanisms in certain extradition proceedings. But does the relevant provision extend to this particular bail decision? If the US prosecution intends to pursue judicial review, what is its legal basis, does it have standing, and what specific error is it asking the High Court to correct? This report examines the legal questions, the American officials and agencies involved in the wider case, the attorneys pursuing the applications in Guyana, and the implications for Guyana's judicial independence. THE QUESTIONS THAT MATTER: Who is directing the US legal effort to have Mohamed's extradition bail revoked? What legal authority allows the US prosecution to challenge the magistrate's decision? Can judicial review become another opportunity to argue the same bail application? Must a foreign government follow the same legal procedures as every other party before Guyana's courts? What does this dispute mean for Guyana's sovereignty and the independence of its judiciary? This is not about placing anyone above the law. It is about ensuring that the law applies equally, regardless of whether the party seeking a particular outcome is a local prosecutor or a powerful foreign government. Guyana's courts must answer to the law — not political pressure, diplomatic influence or the demands of any foreign power. Watch the full report and decide: Is this simply a legitimate legal challenge, or is Guyana facing a bigger test of its judicial independence? AI Generated #AzruddinMohamed #Guyana #USDOJ #FBI #DEA

loool

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy