@hphuong_0608: Tiếp tục với series, hôm nay sẽ là bài POTM với ý tưởng thuật toán là Prefix Sum. Nguồn: VNOJ (Beginner Contest 53 - POTM). Hứa hẹn sẽ có nhiều bài bổ não và hay cho mn😍 link notebook: https://notebook.uniedu.vn/?nb=mw344wo6841eec #coding #trending #laptrinhviendangyeu #LearnOnTikTok #xuhuong

Fhuongg
Fhuongg
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Thursday 05 November 2026 11:20:27 GMT
1157
97
35
86

Music

Download

Comments

doanthevinh.vn
Vinh bá khí 🥶 :
A trai dạy e lập trình code sao cô ấy thích e là đc nha a
2026-11-05 11:42:13
2
ttd121906
🐰sanaM :
Bố Sỹ nói là nhớ m lắm, về chơi đi Phương:))
2026-11-05 12:08:44
1
nhgh28_09
Gia Hân :
ae c8 có 1 content dùng chung à
2026-11-05 11:51:01
2
kkdd3607
duc dy. :
Prefix Sum có giúp cộng dồn tcam crs dành cho mình ko ạ……
2026-11-05 11:54:39
1
tntkhang2704
Tuấn Khang :
Tuat lớp trưởng copy bố 🐧
2026-11-05 11:35:20
1
hongphc7033
Hoàng Phúc Đỗ :
ước gì nam lầy tivi cũng được 1 phần 10 em
2026-11-05 14:47:39
1
iuuubaotran
Tien Quan. :
căng đấy
2026-11-05 11:35:18
1
pk_yeuem8
phước khang :
ồn quá fen
2026-11-05 11:28:29
1
phm.quang.vinh46
lốp trưởng 🤡🤡 :
1 conten mấy thg vắt r fuong
2026-11-05 11:32:53
1
dieu.linhm
linh lốve :
điều kiện gia nhập là gì ạ
2026-11-05 12:03:05
1
nguoicubu2403
baor :
e iu a
2026-11-05 11:28:16
1
tein.dat69
🐉Đạt rồng🐉 :
nhớ bạn Phương quá🥹
2026-11-05 12:30:44
1
hphuong_0608
Fhuongg :
link note của bài ở dưới phần mô tả nha mn
2026-11-05 11:24:45
1
dplayergod
Nhân cách thứ✌️của DPlayerGod :
gà quá
2026-11-05 11:44:53
1
thnhhiu15
Dù sao thì :
nếu dãy không tăng dần thì sao ạ
2026-11-05 16:00:43
1
super_defender_81
ma fi a in tô lét :
ủa POTM là player of the match mà -))
2026-11-05 11:42:36
1
aosima_quingot36
Quingot học ngu😓🥳 :
Biết chuyên tin r
2026-11-05 11:41:05
1
fcoanbeckenbauer
Hai mái đẹp trai tán gái 😎 :
😳
2026-11-06 04:06:01
0
cutes1tgioi_16
Đặng Hân :
xàm dễ sợ😓
2026-11-05 11:26:49
1
nguyn.phc243
No hope👤 :
có cái content nhai quài
2026-11-05 11:29:48
1
maifan1s
🐉C.Nhân🐟🐉 :
1 content cả c8 nấu hết😇
2026-11-05 11:27:18
1
pht.211
Phát Huỳnh :
chưa chặn là may[Cười lớn]
2026-11-05 12:16:50
2
dcudoi_11
hbp :
lại bđ tạo
2026-11-05 11:38:03
1
hihi.khnalnyh
ka_lờ :
ê phiền qus nh
2026-11-05 11:40:03
1
To see more videos from user @hphuong_0608, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

“In 1845, Marx broke radically with every theory that based history and politics on an essence of man. This unique rupture contained three indissociable elements. (1) The formation of a theory of history and politics based on radically new concepts: the concepts of social formation, productive forces, relations of production, superstructure, ideologies, determination in the last instance by the economy, specific determination of the other levels, etc. (2) A radical critique of the theoretical pretensions of every philosophical humanism. (3) The definition of humanism as an ideology. This new conception is completely rigorous as well, but it is a new rigour: the essence criticized (2) is defined as an ideology (3), a category belonging to the new theory of society and history (1). This rupture with every philosophical anthropology or humanism is no secondary detail; it is Marx’s scientific discovery. It means that Marx rejected the problematic of the earlier philosophy and adopted a new problematic in one and the same act. The earlier idealist (‘bourgeois’) philosophy depended in all its domains and arguments (its ‘theory of knowledge’, its conception of history, its political economy, its ethics, its aesthetics, etc.) on a problematic of human nature (or the essence of man). For centuries, this problematic had been transparency itself, and no one had thought of questioning it even in its internal modifications. This problematic was neither vague nor loose; on the contrary, it was constituted by a coherent system of precise concepts tightly articulated together. When Marx confronted it, it implied the two complementary postulates he defined in the Sixth Thesis on Feuerbach: (1) that there is a universal essence of man; (2) that this essence is the attribute of ‘each single individual’ who is its real subject. These two postulates are complementary and indissociable. But their existence and their unity presuppose a whole empiricist-idealist world outlook. If the essence of man is to be a universal attribute, it is essential that concrete subjects exist as absolute givens; this implies an empiricism of the subject. If these empirical individuals are to be men, it is essential that each carries in himself the whole human essence, if not in fact, at least in principle; this implies an idealism of the essence. So empiricism of the subject implies idealism of the essence and vice versa. This relation can be inverted into its ‘opposite’ – empiricism of the concept/idealism of the subject. But the inversion respects the basic structure of the problematic, which remains fixed.” — Louis Althusser #communism #socialist #leftist #marxism #lenin
“In 1845, Marx broke radically with every theory that based history and politics on an essence of man. This unique rupture contained three indissociable elements. (1) The formation of a theory of history and politics based on radically new concepts: the concepts of social formation, productive forces, relations of production, superstructure, ideologies, determination in the last instance by the economy, specific determination of the other levels, etc. (2) A radical critique of the theoretical pretensions of every philosophical humanism. (3) The definition of humanism as an ideology. This new conception is completely rigorous as well, but it is a new rigour: the essence criticized (2) is defined as an ideology (3), a category belonging to the new theory of society and history (1). This rupture with every philosophical anthropology or humanism is no secondary detail; it is Marx’s scientific discovery. It means that Marx rejected the problematic of the earlier philosophy and adopted a new problematic in one and the same act. The earlier idealist (‘bourgeois’) philosophy depended in all its domains and arguments (its ‘theory of knowledge’, its conception of history, its political economy, its ethics, its aesthetics, etc.) on a problematic of human nature (or the essence of man). For centuries, this problematic had been transparency itself, and no one had thought of questioning it even in its internal modifications. This problematic was neither vague nor loose; on the contrary, it was constituted by a coherent system of precise concepts tightly articulated together. When Marx confronted it, it implied the two complementary postulates he defined in the Sixth Thesis on Feuerbach: (1) that there is a universal essence of man; (2) that this essence is the attribute of ‘each single individual’ who is its real subject. These two postulates are complementary and indissociable. But their existence and their unity presuppose a whole empiricist-idealist world outlook. If the essence of man is to be a universal attribute, it is essential that concrete subjects exist as absolute givens; this implies an empiricism of the subject. If these empirical individuals are to be men, it is essential that each carries in himself the whole human essence, if not in fact, at least in principle; this implies an idealism of the essence. So empiricism of the subject implies idealism of the essence and vice versa. This relation can be inverted into its ‘opposite’ – empiricism of the concept/idealism of the subject. But the inversion respects the basic structure of the problematic, which remains fixed.” — Louis Althusser #communism #socialist #leftist #marxism #lenin

About